Talk:Rhinoceros dolphin: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:48, 6 April 2011

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptozoology, an attempt to improve coverage of the pseudoscience and subculture of cryptozoology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the redirect attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.CryptozoologyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptozoologyTemplate:WikiProject CryptozoologyCryptids articles
Redirect	This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Cetaceans Stub‑class (inactive)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cetaceans, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CetaceansWikipedia:WikiProject CetaceansTemplate:WikiProject CetaceansCetaceans articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Picture

That is absolutely the worst picture I've ever seen on Wikipedia.

Paint strikes again, thanks Microsoft. And whoever made it calls themselves an artist, haha! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.59.84.157 (talk) 15:36, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is obviously just a common dolphin. Isn't it?--PiKaPi talk blog 23:51, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fictional

Is this made up. Really? Is this notable anyway? Outback the koala (talk) 06:56, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Justification for deletion

My justification for nominating this article for deletion is thus: Why should Wikipedia have an article about an imaginary species whose claims to notability are a self-published Angelfire website and an appearance in a fictional cartoon show? Prod was removed because "theres a source", presumably referring to the self-published Angelfire website. 63.104.174.146 (talk) 21:48, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 Is this made up. Really? Is this notable anyway? [[User:Outback the koala|Outback the koala]] ([[User talk:Outback the koala|talk]]) 06:56, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
+== Justification for deletion ==
+My justification for nominating this article for deletion is thus: '''Why should Wikipedia have an article about an imaginary species whose claims to notability are a self-published Angelfire website and an appearance in a fictional cartoon show? Prod was removed because "theres a source", presumably referring to the self-published Angelfire website.''' [[Special:Contributions/63.104.174.146|63.104.174.146]] ([[User talk:63.104.174.146|talk]]) 21:48, 6 April 2011 (UTC)