Talk:Mobile television: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:30, 14 April 2011

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Wikify

Needs more wiki. Mathiastck 20:44, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of the erroneous statement "Due to patent protection, it cannot be disclosed here", we need a reference to the company developing the mobile P2P technology and maybe to the relevant patent.

Anyone could include the newly emerging Chinese TV Phone?

There are a lot of Chinese-made TV Phones on the market. However, they can only reach locally broadcasted TV stations.

Triadwarfare (talk) 16:09, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Consider this

Diff before and after a single IP's edits. --68.161.148.205 (talk) 05:42, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it wasn't just one IP. However, they were in the range 194.237.142.10-194.237.142.21. --68.161.148.205 (talk) 05:47, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bias in Digital TV - North America Section

This section screams of bias against the FCC and its choices. Its one thing to present the fact that the FCC chose a certain standard and remark that other regions of the world use different standards. Its quite another to consistently bash the FCC and its choices. This needs rewritten. 96.35.26.210 (talk) 22:53, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Web site change has messed me up

I am unable to find Broadcasting & Cable's updates on the mobile DTV. The web site added a new search function. I just checked a library database which has been of no help.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 20:52, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, the library database EBSCO has intentionally put up a wall keeping anyone from finding anything. It needs to be regarded as useless.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 17:32, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good news. I tried another librarian who pointed out I could read Broadcasting & Cable using EBSCO as if I was reading the real magazine. That should work, though I'll have to do it at another library and their system may be different.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 19:18, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mobile TV Ressources

Hi there, to improve/update this article, you may want to check Mobile Broadcast Business Models, Progress of Country-specific Implementations (02/2010), BMCO and Mobile TV. Happy reading :-) Mentalmoses (talk) 19:54, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, none of this helped and one of them doesn't work at all. ~~I quit.~~Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 17:33, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Subsection wikify

The subsection Digital TV is quite unreadable.--188.26.22.131 (talk) 17:05, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

More info required

Some info about TV signal (antenna) and power suply should be added.--188.26.22.131 (talk) 17:07, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Brands

What notable manufacturers are there?86.125.150.135 (talk) 13:30, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 40: / Line 40: @@
 Some info about TV signal (antenna) and power suply should be added.--[[Special:Contributions/188.26.22.131|188.26.22.131]] ([[User talk:188.26.22.131|talk]]) 17:07, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
+== Brands ==
+What notable manufacturers are there?[[Special:Contributions/86.125.150.135|86.125.150.135]] ([[User talk:86.125.150.135|talk]]) 13:30, 14 April 2011 (UTC)