Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stubes99: Difference between revisions
Banned users have no right to edit on both sides |
Stubes99 is banned too |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{SPIarchive notice|Stubes99}} |
{{SPIarchive notice|Stubes99}} |
||
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
||
{{SPI case status|CUrequest}} |
|||
=====<big>12 May 2011</big>===== |
|||
;Suspected sockpuppets |
|||
* {{checkuser|1=Streptococus}} |
|||
* {{checkuser|1=Brongalostein}} |
|||
* {{checkuser|1=Brunolger}} |
|||
* {{checkuser|1=Taskermapper}} |
|||
<!-- You may duplicate the templates above ({{checkuser}} and {{checkIP}}) to list more accounts--> |
|||
*[http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/uc?uc=Stubes99 User compare report] <small>''Auto-generated every hour.''</small> |
|||
<small>''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>"''</small> |
|||
Blatant socks, per behavioral evidence (edits on his traditional topics: Hungarian medieval history (previously edited by Stubes99 or different socks [[John Zápolya]], [[Central Europe]], [[Battle of Mohács]], [[Noon bell]], [[Hungary]], [[Pál Tomori]], [[Charles I of Hungary]] etc) and technology-related articles) '''It is very curious how this guy who is socking almost on a daily basis and has insulted editors (incluiding personal attacks against the admins Tiptoey and Diannaa) is still unbanned''' [[Special:Contributions/79.117.213.110|79.117.213.110]] ([[User talk:79.117.213.110|talk]]) 08:30, 12 May 2011 (UTC) |
|||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== |
|||
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
|||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
|||
---- |
|||
<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
|||
Revision as of 10:13, 12 May 2011
Stubes99
- Stubes99 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:
– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.
12 May 2011
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Streptococus (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Brongalostein (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Brunolger (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Taskermapper (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
Blatant socks, per behavioral evidence (edits on his traditional topics: Hungarian medieval history (previously edited by Stubes99 or different socks John Zápolya, Central Europe, Battle of Mohács, Noon bell, Hungary, Pál Tomori, Charles I of Hungary etc) and technology-related articles) It is very curious how this guy who is socking almost on a daily basis and has insulted editors (incluiding personal attacks against the admins Tiptoey and Diannaa) is still unbanned 79.117.213.110 (talk) 08:30, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.