User talk:Sean.hoyland: Difference between revisions
MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 5d) to User talk:Sean.hoyland/Archive 4. |
→Pally Pictures: new section |
||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
and then for Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee skip to 1:40:02 <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Jack7188|Jack7188]] ([[User talk:Jack7188|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jack7188|contribs]]) 05:43, 27 May 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
and then for Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee skip to 1:40:02 <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Jack7188|Jack7188]] ([[User talk:Jack7188|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jack7188|contribs]]) 05:43, 27 May 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
== Pally Pictures == |
|||
I'm user 132. That account was banned for a period of time. That period of time is over. I'll use this named account and try my best to be a good member of the community. It is a scientific word for otter. Isn't that cute? |
|||
The three pictures on Palestinian people were removed by me, 132, after I posted a talk page comment about them. No one objected to my reasoning that the pictures are poorly captioned, misleading, and appeal to emotional politics on a page already plagued by controversy. There is also enough pics already. |
|||
Ohiostandard recently put the pics back in without explanation. |
|||
So, what I did was undo Ohiostandard's undoing of a good faith edit that was not contested on the talk page. |
|||
Why did you undo? |
|||
Revision as of 18:24, 31 May 2011
 | This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
Template:Archive box collapsible
This means that I should not continue editing the articles where I had already performed a revert; is there some centralized noticeboard for articles related to Israeli-Palestinian conflict? (11235813ab (talk · contribs), whom I had previously reverted for unexplained removal of referenced material, has now edited Ramot by adding a sentence not really supported by references, and even recursively using Wikipedia as a source.) - Mike Rosoft (talk) 18:18, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, there's Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration/Current Article Issues. 11235813ab is going to get blocked if they carry on. There are plenty of people watching that page so I would hope someone will fix it. Sean.hoyland - talk 18:26, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
Rubashkin
Why do you keep deleting the section on the congressional response when it 100% happened.
See here to read for yourself the 45 congressmen's letters: http://justiceforsholom.org/the-response/congressional-response
See here to hear the hearing:
http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/JusticeDepartmentOve
For Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz skip to 24:10
and then for Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee skip to 1:40:02 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jack7188 (talk • contribs) 05:43, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Pally Pictures
I'm user 132. That account was banned for a period of time. That period of time is over. I'll use this named account and try my best to be a good member of the community. It is a scientific word for otter. Isn't that cute?
The three pictures on Palestinian people were removed by me, 132, after I posted a talk page comment about them. No one objected to my reasoning that the pictures are poorly captioned, misleading, and appeal to emotional politics on a page already plagued by controversy. There is also enough pics already.
Ohiostandard recently put the pics back in without explanation.
So, what I did was undo Ohiostandard's undoing of a good faith edit that was not contested on the talk page.
Why did you undo?