User talk:NoToFrauds: Difference between revisions
NoToFrauds (talk | contribs) |
Hanuman Das (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Well, I will give YGS the benefit of the doubt...for now. I do hope [[User:Hamsacharya dan|Hamsacharya dan]] or someone starts a properly objective NPOV page about him. I am doing some research. I think I may have found a classmate of his so I can add his birth name to any new article. (Do you know it?) I too would like to see the question of who YGS's living Nath Guru was and did he explicitly receive parampara? When and where was he initiated? How can he claim to be of the [[Adi-Nath Sampradaya]] when that sub-sect was a [[sannyasin]] sub-sect? Was he at one time a sannyasin and later renounce those vows? If so, he could be a [[Nath]], but not an [[Adi Nath]], but ''only if he has a valid lineage''. If there are no answers to these questions, there will certainly be a ''disputed assertions'' section added to his biography. I personally do not want to do so because I don't want it to look like sectarian infighting, but somebody will have to do it, and do it correctly and without malice or rancor. Of course, all this is separate from the issue of Wikipedia not allowing cut & paste from copyrighted sites. Just because HD is a member and teacher doesn't mean he is the copyright agent. I doubt the real copyright agent will release the text under the [[GFDL]] if he know what that means. In any case, the current page was not NPOV and so was inappropriate for Wikiepdia. –[[User:Adityanath|Adityanath]] 01:44, 8 March 2006 (UTC) |
Well, I will give YGS the benefit of the doubt...for now. I do hope [[User:Hamsacharya dan|Hamsacharya dan]] or someone starts a properly objective NPOV page about him. I am doing some research. I think I may have found a classmate of his so I can add his birth name to any new article. (Do you know it?) I too would like to see the question of who YGS's living Nath Guru was and did he explicitly receive parampara? When and where was he initiated? How can he claim to be of the [[Adi-Nath Sampradaya]] when that sub-sect was a [[sannyasin]] sub-sect? Was he at one time a sannyasin and later renounce those vows? If so, he could be a [[Nath]], but not an [[Adi Nath]], but ''only if he has a valid lineage''. If there are no answers to these questions, there will certainly be a ''disputed assertions'' section added to his biography. I personally do not want to do so because I don't want it to look like sectarian infighting, but somebody will have to do it, and do it correctly and without malice or rancor. Of course, all this is separate from the issue of Wikipedia not allowing cut & paste from copyrighted sites. Just because HD is a member and teacher doesn't mean he is the copyright agent. I doubt the real copyright agent will release the text under the [[GFDL]] if he know what that means. In any case, the current page was not NPOV and so was inappropriate for Wikiepdia. –[[User:Adityanath|Adityanath]] 01:44, 8 March 2006 (UTC) |
||
==Brother== |
|||
I will have to leave this mess in your capable hands. Do what you will, I've removed the warning and will clear from admin messageboard. I will be on vacation for a week starting tomorrow. You must eat this message :-) You should be aware that Mercury is retrograde until March 25th. It will be hard to control the speech of rascals. Please keep an eye on [[Nath]] and [[Adi-Nath]] for me. I will disappear until Mercury goes direct again then clean up any remaining mess. Remember, eat this message. —[[User:Adityanath|Adityanath]] 23:15, 10 March 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 23:15, 10 March 2006
Yogiraj Gurunath Siddhanath
Well, I will give YGS the benefit of the doubt...for now. I do hope Hamsacharya dan or someone starts a properly objective NPOV page about him. I am doing some research. I think I may have found a classmate of his so I can add his birth name to any new article. (Do you know it?) I too would like to see the question of who YGS's living Nath Guru was and did he explicitly receive parampara? When and where was he initiated? How can he claim to be of the Adi-Nath Sampradaya when that sub-sect was a sannyasin sub-sect? Was he at one time a sannyasin and later renounce those vows? If so, he could be a Nath, but not an Adi Nath, but only if he has a valid lineage. If there are no answers to these questions, there will certainly be a disputed assertions section added to his biography. I personally do not want to do so because I don't want it to look like sectarian infighting, but somebody will have to do it, and do it correctly and without malice or rancor. Of course, all this is separate from the issue of Wikipedia not allowing cut & paste from copyrighted sites. Just because HD is a member and teacher doesn't mean he is the copyright agent. I doubt the real copyright agent will release the text under the GFDL if he know what that means. In any case, the current page was not NPOV and so was inappropriate for Wikiepdia. –Adityanath 01:44, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
Brother
I will have to leave this mess in your capable hands. Do what you will, I've removed the warning and will clear from admin messageboard. I will be on vacation for a week starting tomorrow. You must eat this message :-) You should be aware that Mercury is retrograde until March 25th. It will be hard to control the speech of rascals. Please keep an eye on Nath and Adi-Nath for me. I will disappear until Mercury goes direct again then clean up any remaining mess. Remember, eat this message. —Adityanath 23:15, 10 March 2006 (UTC)