Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dogballs: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:56, 11 March 2006

Dogballs

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

It's a dictdef of a slang term. Not encyclopedic. Since it's slang wiktionary won't want it, just delete. RJFJR 04:45, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom Eivind 04:59, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. "Dogballs is a slang term used in the game of golf." Really? By whom? Oh wait, nobody that would make this WP:V and not WP:NFT or WP:NEO. --Kinu ^t/_c 05:02, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh, and feel free to insert your own WP:DOGBALLS joke here. --Kinu ^t/_c 05:03, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not just slang, but slang that I, as a golfer, have never heard. For the record, this is precisely the kind of slang I'd use if it were in common use ;) --Deville (Talk) 05:25, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:WINAD WP:NEO WP:V Шизомби 06:21, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This deserves, at best, a mention in an article on golf, not its own articleAyreon 12:17, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't delete. It's a term I've used many times. I'm a golfer.

Surprise, user's only other contribution is removing the AfD from the article. (Restored.) --Kinu ^t/_c 07:25, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here's another surprise...those that are commenting are self-rightous in their comments and aren't avid golfers. Sorry to take down the last message...it was an error. :(

Delete unable to verify usage in this context, does not google. Neologism. Accurizer 13:51, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unverifiable, neologism. --Ter e nc e Ong 15:56, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is valid. I work at a golf company. Often used. Request to NOT delete. --User:Snappper08:11, 10 March 2006

Valid slang - I'm an avid golfer. Golf is riddled with cliches and euphemisms, don't deprive the world of this legitimate entry.

Delete. At the very least, the 'source' is not a verifiable one. Remy B 17:46, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable cliché.--Ezeu 17:58, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Transwiki to wiktionary, or a golf or slang wiki, if there is one that wants it. It seems to be legitimate slang, just not encyclopedic. Bayberrylane 21:29, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
don't delete : I also found an instance of dog balls here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_slang_names_for_poker_hands#Texas_Hold_.27Em_Slang

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 *'''Delete''' as non-notable cliché.--[[User:Ezeu|Ezeu]] 17:58, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
 *'''Transwiki''' to wiktionary, or a golf or slang wiki, if there is one that wants it. It seems to be legitimate slang, just not encyclopedic. [[User:Bayberrylane|Bayberrylane]] 21:29, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
+*'''don't delete''' : I also found an instance of dog balls here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_slang_names_for_poker_hands#Texas_Hold_.27Em_Slang