Talk:El Dorado (1966 film): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 04:51, 5 June 2011

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Well this is a horrible article, whoever wrote it obviously skipped the part about uses sources and not using your opinions. It sounds like the article was written by a reviewer rather than someone who used reviews as sources. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.137.207.191 (talk) 20:35, 29 March 2008 (UTC) When someone does fix up this article, try to put info on the plot into the Plot section rather than the Intro. And don't use descriptive words like "excitement" and "wonder" to describe the film without actual sources that say that. Personally I don't get any excitement or wonder out of this, which opinion is more right? The one that says something isn't there, I don't need sources to delete your opinions, you do need them to keep them up. Simple eh? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.137.207.191 (talk) 20:46, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you fix it yourself, dickhead?

Nelson not Nelse for the name of the gunfighter for hireBoxcar456 (talk) 19:54, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article name and lede disagree

1967 or 1966? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:44, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I moved it to 1966, everything else said 1966. JesseRafe (talk) 21:26, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 Well this is a horrible article, whoever wrote it obviously skipped the part about uses sources and not using your opinions. It sounds like the article was written by a reviewer rather than someone who used reviews as sources.  <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/24.137.207.191|24.137.207.191]] ([[User talk:24.137.207.191|talk]]) 20:35, 29 March 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 When someone does fix up this article, try to put info on the plot into the Plot section rather than the Intro. And don't use descriptive words like "excitement" and "wonder" to describe the film without actual sources that say that. Personally I don't get any excitement or wonder out of this, which opinion is more right? The one that says something isn't there, I don't need sources to delete your opinions, you do need them to keep them up. Simple eh?  <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/24.137.207.191|24.137.207.191]] ([[User talk:24.137.207.191|talk]]) 20:46, 29 March 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+Why don't you fix it yourself, dickhead?
 Nelson not Nelse for the name of the gunfighter for hire[[User:Boxcar456|Boxcar456]] ([[User talk:Boxcar456|talk]]) 19:54, 22 May 2008 (UTC)