Jump to content

Talk:Xserve: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Skootles (talk | contribs)
Skootles (talk | contribs)
Line 27: Line 27:
The image being used under the Intel Xserve section is the same as the G5 Xserve, as I had noted when reading that the Intel one had a USB port on front instead of FireWire in the PowerPC models. Should the image be replaced? [[User:ChrstphrChvz|ChrstphrChvz]] ([[User talk:ChrstphrChvz|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/ChrstphrChvz|contribs]]) 04:21, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
The image being used under the Intel Xserve section is the same as the G5 Xserve, as I had noted when reading that the Intel one had a USB port on front instead of FireWire in the PowerPC models. Should the image be replaced? [[User:ChrstphrChvz|ChrstphrChvz]] ([[User talk:ChrstphrChvz|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/ChrstphrChvz|contribs]]) 04:21, 12 June 2011 (UTC)


:I think it should be fine. Not all Intel Xserves have USB ports on the front. I have 2 at work that have firewire 400 ports and look identical to the G5 sitting above them.
:I think it should be fine. Not all Intel Xserves have USB ports on the front. I have 2 at work that have firewire 400 ports and look identical to the G5 sitting above them. [[User:Skootles|Skootles]] ([[User talk:Skootles|talk]]) 02:16, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:16, 14 June 2011

WikiProject iconApple Inc. Start‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Errors

The xserver clusternode has dual gigabit ethernet ports. A server shipping _without_ ethernet port would be pretty crazy, even for Apple.


Needed Section

It seems as if this article could use a section on "Criticism" or "Reception" of Macintosh's Xserve servers. 24.175.54.43 05:47, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

---Agreed, says I! User: Coyotejack 21:04, 13 July 2006

Could someone mention the operating systems currently supported on this boxes? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.247.147.124 (talkcontribs) 08:09, August 24, 2007

Name

Is the Xserve actually officially referred to as a "Macintosh" anywhere? Is there some official Wikipedia convention that makes it one regardless of that? I vaguely remember reading some years ago about about how Apple were trying to phase out the Macintosh name, or at least replace it with "Mac". --68.44.13.236 21:31, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting question... now that you mention it, I've never heard the term "Macintosh" or "Mac" used in reference to the XServe. Maury 23:24, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Apple no longer sells a "Macintosh". everything is either MacSomething or just a name —Preceding unsigned comment added by Petchboo (talkcontribs) 20:48, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The link to UATA, near "Up to 4 UATA/100 hard disk drives", leads to a page that does not contain UATA. --Mortense (talk) 08:21, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Intel Xserve image

The image being used under the Intel Xserve section is the same as the G5 Xserve, as I had noted when reading that the Intel one had a USB port on front instead of FireWire in the PowerPC models. Should the image be replaced? ChrstphrChvz (talkcontribs) 04:21, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think it should be fine. Not all Intel Xserves have USB ports on the front. I have 2 at work that have firewire 400 ports and look identical to the G5 sitting above them. Skootles (talk) 02:16, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]