Talk:Klipsch Audio Technologies: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Please stop fanboyism.
MetraB (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 16: Line 16:


24.203.30.227
24.203.30.227

I've tried to clean up the page, but I ended up making it shorter. Perhaps Vesther or some other audio-watching Wikipedians could help me neutrally expand this page.[[User:MetraB|MetraB]] 03:39, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:39, 14 March 2006

The amount of fanboyism that has been on this page is astonishing. (see history for details).

Examples:

4 november 2004 | Nuclear writes: Reputation has long had it that Klipsch speakers are the best speakers in the world.

27 January 2005 | H4ze writes: One of Klipsch's most successful endeavours has been it's ProMedia line of high end computer speakers. The ProMedias impressed reviewers with their power and sound quality at a time when computer speakers were associated with anemic and lackluster sound.

21 May 2005: 67.166.141.110 writes: It was one of the greatest speakers of its time and, even today, can hold its own against many newly designed high end speakers.

I myself have sometimes fallen into this, putting comments on the ProMedia's amplifier problems that had no place in Wikipedia.

Toh has done a good job removing the tone introduced by 67.78.145.234, who used words like "staggering efficiency" or "amazing efficiency".

But, as he/she says, the page "still needs cleanup to read less like audiophile ad copy".

24.203.30.227

I've tried to clean up the page, but I ended up making it shorter. Perhaps Vesther or some other audio-watching Wikipedians could help me neutrally expand this page.MetraB 03:39, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]