Talk:Klipsch Audio Technologies: Difference between revisions
Please stop fanboyism. |
No edit summary |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
24.203.30.227 |
24.203.30.227 |
||
I've tried to clean up the page, but I ended up making it shorter. Perhaps Vesther or some other audio-watching Wikipedians could help me neutrally expand this page.[[User:MetraB|MetraB]] 03:39, 14 March 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:39, 14 March 2006
The amount of fanboyism that has been on this page is astonishing. (see history for details).
Examples:
4 november 2004 | Nuclear writes: Reputation has long had it that Klipsch speakers are the best speakers in the world.
27 January 2005 | H4ze writes: One of Klipsch's most successful endeavours has been it's ProMedia line of high end computer speakers. The ProMedias impressed reviewers with their power and sound quality at a time when computer speakers were associated with anemic and lackluster sound.
21 May 2005: 67.166.141.110 writes: It was one of the greatest speakers of its time and, even today, can hold its own against many newly designed high end speakers.
I myself have sometimes fallen into this, putting comments on the ProMedia's amplifier problems that had no place in Wikipedia.
Toh has done a good job removing the tone introduced by 67.78.145.234, who used words like "staggering efficiency" or "amazing efficiency".
But, as he/she says, the page "still needs cleanup to read less like audiophile ad copy".
24.203.30.227
I've tried to clean up the page, but I ended up making it shorter. Perhaps Vesther or some other audio-watching Wikipedians could help me neutrally expand this page.MetraB 03:39, 14 March 2006 (UTC)