Jump to content

User talk:Scolaire: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Thanks: welcome
Talk:2001 Bangladesh census
Line 20: Line 20:


:You're welcome. Places like that can be hard to find if you're not in the know. [[User:Scolaire|Scolaire]] ([[User talk:Scolaire#top|talk]]) 18:52, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
:You're welcome. Places like that can be hard to find if you're not in the know. [[User:Scolaire|Scolaire]] ([[User talk:Scolaire#top|talk]]) 18:52, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

==Talk:2001 Bangladesh census==
Hi Scolaire. I'm the IP user who made {{diff|Talk:2001 Bangladesh census|436860888|436842545|this edit}}, which you subsequently undid. I'm not really sure what you mean by 'unauthorised'. Did you even read the discussion? Closing the first survey to open another as I did, was even suggested by an administrator. It's a continuation of the same discussion on a slightly different topic in a better format, rather than a closure. The initial voting remains visible, and the discussion section is still open.

The thing is there's an ''obvious'' consensus for renaming the articles to get some standardisation, but there's confusion about which new format to adopt. It's worse than confusion - there's no structure in the initial discussion to determine which format to use. That's why I made the straw poll section, so we can get some clearer idea of what people prefer. I'd appreciate it if you undid your edit, or implement the clarifying section by yourself, so we can get on and find the consensus for the new names. Please leave any reply here as I'm on a dynamic IP. Thanks. [[Special:Contributions/78.146.252.55|78.146.252.55]] ([[User talk:78.146.252.55|talk]]) 10:45, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:45, 30 June 2011

Thanks

Scolaire, Many thanks for removing my request for review for Neo-Unionism in Ireland and inserting the article into Ireland related deletion discussions. Sorry, I was not aware that that forum existed and agree that it appears to be the appropriate place to deal with the issue. FrankFlanagan (talk) 13:50, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Places like that can be hard to find if you're not in the know. Scolaire (talk) 18:52, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:2001 Bangladesh census

Hi Scolaire. I'm the IP user who made this edit, which you subsequently undid. I'm not really sure what you mean by 'unauthorised'. Did you even read the discussion? Closing the first survey to open another as I did, was even suggested by an administrator. It's a continuation of the same discussion on a slightly different topic in a better format, rather than a closure. The initial voting remains visible, and the discussion section is still open.

The thing is there's an obvious consensus for renaming the articles to get some standardisation, but there's confusion about which new format to adopt. It's worse than confusion - there's no structure in the initial discussion to determine which format to use. That's why I made the straw poll section, so we can get some clearer idea of what people prefer. I'd appreciate it if you undid your edit, or implement the clarifying section by yourself, so we can get on and find the consensus for the new names. Please leave any reply here as I'm on a dynamic IP. Thanks. 78.146.252.55 (talk) 10:45, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]