Buzaglo test: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
In 1976, the [[Attorney General of Israel]] at the time, [[Aharon Barak]], decided to begin a criminal investigation against [[Asher Yadlin]] in relation to the [[Yadlin affair]]. Yadlin, an important figure in the dominant [[Mapai]] party who was under consideration for the position of Governor of the [[Bank of Israel]], was suspected of theft and receiving bribes. He was convicted and sentenced to five years imprisonment. |
In 1976, the [[Attorney General of Israel]] at the time, [[Aharon Barak]], decided to begin a criminal investigation against [[Asher Yadlin]] in relation to the [[Yadlin affair]]. Yadlin, an important figure in the dominant [[Mapai]] party who was under consideration for the position of Governor of the [[Bank of Israel]], was suspected of theft and receiving bribes. He was convicted and sentenced to five years imprisonment. |
||
Barak's decision was significant at the time due to the prolonged dominance of the [[Mapai]] party in Israeli politics and society. Referring to the decision, Barak coined the phrase "the law for Yadlin is the same as the law for Buzaglo" (Din Yadlin - KeDin Buzaglo). The phrase was intended to mean that both the strong and the weak in society were subject to the law. Yadlin represented the predominately [[Ashkenazi]] political elite of Israel, whereas Buzaglo represented the [[Mizrahi |
Barak's decision was significant at the time due to the prolonged dominance of the [[Mapai]] party in Israeli politics and society. Referring to the decision, Barak coined the phrase "the law for Yadlin is the same as the law for Buzaglo" (Din Yadlin - KeDin Buzaglo). The phrase was intended to mean that both the strong and the weak in society were subject to the law. Yadlin represented the predominately [[Ashkenazi]] political elite of Israel, whereas Buzaglo represented the [[Mizrahi]] population, which at the time were considerably poorer and weaker. |
||
Although it was originally used in the context of the [[rule of law]] and specific corruption charges, the Buzaglo test has since become a [[litmus test]] for a range of inter-ethnic issues in Israel. |
Although it was originally used in the context of the [[rule of law]] and specific corruption charges, the Buzaglo test has since become a [[litmus test]] for a range of inter-ethnic issues in Israel. |
||
Revision as of 13:28, 6 July 2011
The Buzaglo test is a phrase coined in Israeli law which subsequently developed into an idiom in Israel.
In 1976, the Attorney General of Israel at the time, Aharon Barak, decided to begin a criminal investigation against Asher Yadlin in relation to the Yadlin affair. Yadlin, an important figure in the dominant Mapai party who was under consideration for the position of Governor of the Bank of Israel, was suspected of theft and receiving bribes. He was convicted and sentenced to five years imprisonment.
Barak's decision was significant at the time due to the prolonged dominance of the Mapai party in Israeli politics and society. Referring to the decision, Barak coined the phrase "the law for Yadlin is the same as the law for Buzaglo" (Din Yadlin - KeDin Buzaglo). The phrase was intended to mean that both the strong and the weak in society were subject to the law. Yadlin represented the predominately Ashkenazi political elite of Israel, whereas Buzaglo represented the Mizrahi population, which at the time were considerably poorer and weaker.
Although it was originally used in the context of the rule of law and specific corruption charges, the Buzaglo test has since become a litmus test for a range of inter-ethnic issues in Israel.