Jump to content

Talk:Liquid funk: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Zoele (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:


Yeah people keep adding red-links back to the lists, not sure whether its worth having "red-linked" artists on the list. What are people's thoughts on this?[[User:Jayflux|Jayflux]] ([[User talk:Jayflux|talk]]) 22:36, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
Yeah people keep adding red-links back to the lists, not sure whether its worth having "red-linked" artists on the list. What are people's thoughts on this?[[User:Jayflux|Jayflux]] ([[User talk:Jayflux|talk]]) 22:36, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

== This whole genre could be a stub. ==
Unless people really define its stylistic origin and stop putting everything thats just not in another sub genre into Liquid. It's starting to get bloated and redundant from general Drum & Bass. Alot of artists share roughly the same sentiment.[[User:Zoele|Zoele]] ([[User talk:Zoele|talk]]) 22:48, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:48, 11 July 2011

WikiProject iconElectronic music Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMusic/Music genres task force Start‑class
WikiProject iconLiquid funk is within the scope of the Music genres task force of the Music project, a user driven attempt to clean up and standardize music genre articles on Wikipedia. Please visit the task force guidelines page for ideas on how to structure a genre article and help us assess and improve genre articles to good article status.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Lists

I've cleaned up the lists in this article by removing all redlinks, and some of the articles blue-linked were unrelated. Embedded lists should really be avoided.

The list of artists still has a lot of... interesting links that are completely unrelated.Evil oatmeal (talk) 22:00, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah people keep adding red-links back to the lists, not sure whether its worth having "red-linked" artists on the list. What are people's thoughts on this?Jayflux (talk) 22:36, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This whole genre could be a stub.

Unless people really define its stylistic origin and stop putting everything thats just not in another sub genre into Liquid. It's starting to get bloated and redundant from general Drum & Bass. Alot of artists share roughly the same sentiment.Zoele (talk) 22:48, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]