Talk:Liquid funk: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Yeah people keep adding red-links back to the lists, not sure whether its worth having "red-linked" artists on the list. What are people's thoughts on this?[[User:Jayflux|Jayflux]] ([[User talk:Jayflux|talk]]) 22:36, 21 October 2009 (UTC) |
Yeah people keep adding red-links back to the lists, not sure whether its worth having "red-linked" artists on the list. What are people's thoughts on this?[[User:Jayflux|Jayflux]] ([[User talk:Jayflux|talk]]) 22:36, 21 October 2009 (UTC) |
||
== This whole genre could be a stub. == |
|||
Unless people really define its stylistic origin and stop putting everything thats just not in another sub genre into Liquid. It's starting to get bloated and redundant from general Drum & Bass. Alot of artists share roughly the same sentiment.[[User:Zoele|Zoele]] ([[User talk:Zoele|talk]]) 22:48, 11 July 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:48, 11 July 2011
Electronic music Start‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Music/Music genres task force Start‑class | |||||||
|
Lists
I've cleaned up the lists in this article by removing all redlinks, and some of the articles blue-linked were unrelated. Embedded lists should really be avoided.
- The list of artists still has a lot of... interesting links that are completely unrelated.Evil oatmeal (talk) 22:00, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Yeah people keep adding red-links back to the lists, not sure whether its worth having "red-linked" artists on the list. What are people's thoughts on this?Jayflux (talk) 22:36, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
This whole genre could be a stub.
Unless people really define its stylistic origin and stop putting everything thats just not in another sub genre into Liquid. It's starting to get bloated and redundant from general Drum & Bass. Alot of artists share roughly the same sentiment.Zoele (talk) 22:48, 11 July 2011 (UTC)