User talk:Kingrivera: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:45, 23 July 2011

January 28, 2011

Edit war? How about be truthful. Intact is not the same as uncircumcised. Intact describes something that has not been damaged. Uncircumcised describes the penis of a man who has undergone foreskin restoration, "I am uncircumcising myself." Men in most of the world do not call themselves "uncircumcised" because they were never cut, they are INTACT. They have an intact penis with a normal foreskin.

February 2011

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Foreskin. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Jayjg ^(talk) 22:55, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

I did not add commentary to Wikipedia, so what are you talking about? I corrected the page. The correct word for a man that has not undergone circumcision is "intact." K. M. @. if you're going to be a dictator and change everything to your own opinion instead of correct terms.

July 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Masturbation, you may be blocked from editing. Scheinwerfermann (talk) 16:47, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Masturbation, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Scheinwerfermann (talk) 17:41, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

intact is the correct term for a penis that has not been circumcised. go ahead and block me, hitler. i'm not giving another penny to wikipedia because they allow people like yourself and jakew to censor people. now go to hell.

Revision as of 17:41, 23 July 2011 edit Scheinwerfermann (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 10,205 edits Final warning: Not adhering to neutral point of view on Masturbation. (TW) ← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:45, 23 July 2011 edit undo Kingrivera (talk \| contribs) 61 edits →July 2011 Next edit →
Line 13:		Line 13:

	[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg\|30px\|alt=\|link=]] This is your '''last warning'''; the next time you violate Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view\|neutral point of view policy]] by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at [[:Masturbation]], you may be '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy\|blocked]] from editing without further notice'''. <!-- Template:uw-npov4 --> [[User:Scheinwerfermann\|Scheinwerfermann]] ([[User talk:Scheinwerfermann\|talk]]) 17:41, 23 July 2011 (UTC)		[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg\|30px\|alt=\|link=]] This is your '''last warning'''; the next time you violate Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view\|neutral point of view policy]] by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at [[:Masturbation]], you may be '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy\|blocked]] from editing without further notice'''. <!-- Template:uw-npov4 --> [[User:Scheinwerfermann\|Scheinwerfermann]] ([[User talk:Scheinwerfermann\|talk]]) 17:41, 23 July 2011 (UTC)


			intact is the correct term for a penis that has not been circumcised. go ahead and block me, hitler. i'm not giving another penny to wikipedia because they allow people like yourself and jakew to censor people. now go to hell.