Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Hypervelocity Impact Demonstration.jpg: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*'''Support''' nice. -[[User:Ravedave|Ravedave]] 05:30, 18 March 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Support''' nice. -[[User:Ravedave|Ravedave]] 05:30, 18 March 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Oppose''' An incredibly dirty scan, dust, smudges, etc. Check it in full-size before voting! Needs a major photosoup job to be a FP. (Looks like somebody already tried and botched it, see the black "brush marks" in the upper & lower right corners.) --[[User:Janke|Janke]] | [[User talk:Janke|Talk]] 08:40, 18 March 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Oppose''' An incredibly dirty scan, dust, smudges, etc. Check it in full-size before voting! Needs a major photosoup job to be a FP. (Looks like somebody already tried and botched it, see the black "brush marks" in the upper & lower right corners.) --[[User:Janke|Janke]] | [[User talk:Janke|Talk]] 08:40, 18 March 2006 (UTC) |
||
**It almost seems like those brush marks are hiding logos/symbols/atribution information. --[[User:Vaeiou|vaeiou]] 15:35, 18 March 2006 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' Adds significantly to the article. However, I also agree with Janke that quality should be improved. Yet it is a very rare shot and a good illustration that is helping to grasp the destructiveness of a hypervelocity impact. [[User:Mikeo|Mikeo]] 09:03, 18 March 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Support''' Adds significantly to the article. However, I also agree with Janke that quality should be improved. Yet it is a very rare shot and a good illustration that is helping to grasp the destructiveness of a hypervelocity impact. [[User:Mikeo|Mikeo]] 09:03, 18 March 2006 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 15:35, 18 March 2006
An incredible NASA photograph from the space debris article. Brilliant and adds significantly to the article.
- Nominate and support. - CapeCodEph 00:56, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
- Support nice. -Ravedave 05:30, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose An incredibly dirty scan, dust, smudges, etc. Check it in full-size before voting! Needs a major photosoup job to be a FP. (Looks like somebody already tried and botched it, see the black "brush marks" in the upper & lower right corners.) --Janke | Talk 08:40, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
- It almost seems like those brush marks are hiding logos/symbols/atribution information. --vaeiou 15:35, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
- Support Adds significantly to the article. However, I also agree with Janke that quality should be improved. Yet it is a very rare shot and a good illustration that is helping to grasp the destructiveness of a hypervelocity impact. Mikeo 09:03, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
