Talk:Granulocyte: Difference between revisions
Arturkjakub (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20080627/cancer_trial_080627/20080628?hub=TopStories <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/70.131.123.15|70.131.123.15]] ([[User talk:70.131.123.15|talk]]) 06:13, 29 June 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20080627/cancer_trial_080627/20080628?hub=TopStories <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/70.131.123.15|70.131.123.15]] ([[User talk:70.131.123.15|talk]]) 06:13, 29 June 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
:I don't see that this study "cure for cancer" is directly relevant to this page.[[User:JustAnotherKinase|JustAnotherKinase]] ([[User talk:JustAnotherKinase|talk]]) 12:39, 16 August 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== Citation == |
== Citation == |
Revision as of 12:39, 16 August 2011
picture of the eosinophil
Why is the "eosinophil" picture under granulocyte basophilic staining? The granules in the cytoplasm should appear a reddish tint as compared with the surrounding red blood cells.
-tried to remove eosinophil picture and exchange it for a better one, but the wikinazis undid my changes. also, i have not made enough edits so i cannot upload a different image. But this should definitely be fixed...
--also tried to call that first image a neutrophil (it's a poor stain, but the granules still didn't seem dark enough to call it a basophil). Moderators also undid that change. I wish they would at least research the subject for 30 seconds before undoing and calling changes "unproductive" or "non-contributory" or whatever. when wikipedia is incorrect (as it is here), it is unproductive and non-contributory to enhancing public knowledge. it's funny, i went to college for this stuff, yet my expert input is overturned by people that went to school for US History or Computer Science.
- The pictures representing the eosinophils, neutrophils, and basophils are of definite poor quality and in the case of eosinophil/neutrophil, the same image is used. Furthermore, the image should have a description what staining method was used (H&E, Wright-Giemsa, etc.) This is an obvious error that needs to be rectified.Arturkjakub (talk) 13:09, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Cure for cancer
A cure for cancer, at least present this possibility...... Also it can run Crysis at 30 FPS J.K.
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20080627/cancer_trial_080627/20080628?hub=TopStories —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.131.123.15 (talk) 06:13, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
- I don't see that this study "cure for cancer" is directly relevant to this page.JustAnotherKinase (talk) 12:39, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Citation
good review of the immune system--Eulemur2008 (talk) 23:04, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
eosinophil functions--Eulemur2008 (talk) 21:29, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
eosinophil functions--Eulemur2008 (talk) 21:29, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
eosinophil function--Eulemur2008 (talk) 21:29, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
overview of immune cells--Eulemur2008 (talk) 21:29, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
read this and this --Eulemur2008 (talk) 16:12, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
piecemeal degranulationand this--Eulemur2008 (talk) 18:03, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
maybe --Eulemur2008 (talk) 18:09, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
tissue damage--Eulemur2008 (talk) 18:15, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
three types of degranulation (full length article)--Eulemur2008 (talk) 21:58, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
neutrophil degranulation and this--Eulemur2008 (talk) 22:14, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
basophil degranulation--Eulemur2008 (talk) 22:49, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
role of basophils (full text) --Eulemur2008 (talk) 00:08, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
granules and this--Eulemur2008 (talk) 00:08, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
better basophil degranulation--Eulemur2008 (talk) 18:14, 12 April 2009 (UTC)