Talk:Fun Publications: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
NotARealWord (talk | contribs) |
NotARealWord (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Why does the article say "The Timelines toy line has proved extreemly popular"? it's still sourced to the Erin Brereton book, which said '''LANDQUAKE''' was popular. This was already [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transformers: Timelines (2nd nomination)| discussed before]]. Implicit ≠ True, kinda thing. Also "Critics of the comic have said that the stories play directly to the fans of the Transformers conventions and stories center around the toys being introduced each year" looks, weird in that section. That's pretty much fact and how Fun Pub does things, nothing to do with what critics think. I'm just gonna remove that section. [[User:NotARealWord|NotARealWord]] ([[User talk:NotARealWord|talk]]) 18:33, 5 September 2011 (UTC) |
Why does the article say "The Timelines toy line has proved extreemly popular"? it's still sourced to the Erin Brereton book, which said '''LANDQUAKE''' was popular. This was already [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transformers: Timelines (2nd nomination)| discussed before]]. Implicit ≠ True, kinda thing. Also "Critics of the comic have said that the stories play directly to the fans of the Transformers conventions and stories center around the toys being introduced each year" looks, weird in that section. That's pretty much fact and how Fun Pub does things, nothing to do with what critics think. I'm just gonna remove that section. [[User:NotARealWord|NotARealWord]] ([[User talk:NotARealWord|talk]]) 18:33, 5 September 2011 (UTC) |
||
:...and I'm going to put it back in. We can discuss alternate wording though. [[User:Mathewignash|Mathewignash]] ([[User talk:Mathewignash|talk]]) 23:28, 5 September 2011 (UTC) |
:...and I'm going to put it back in. We can discuss alternate wording though. [[User:Mathewignash|Mathewignash]] ([[User talk:Mathewignash|talk]]) 23:28, 5 September 2011 (UTC) |
||
::It's not even all that true, they're not always all that popular. Most recent example, [http://www.allspark.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=81317 BotCon Galvatron] sold for like £32.90 on eBay. There's also that BotCon 2010 |
::It's not even all that true, they're not always all that popular. Most recent example, [http://www.allspark.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=81317 BotCon Galvatron] sold for like £32.90 on eBay. There's also that [http://www.bigbadtoystore.com/bbts/product.aspx?product=HAS19144&mode=retail BotCon 2010 sets] BigBadToyStore is ''still'' trying to clearance, and Fun Pub had some Descent into Evil sets left over until what, 2009? Seriously, "extreemly popular" is not even true. Plus, the "extreemly" typo has never been corrected. [[User:NotARealWord|NotARealWord]] ([[User talk:NotARealWord|talk]]) 09:38, 6 September 2011 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 09:39, 6 September 2011
Reception
Why does the article say "The Timelines toy line has proved extreemly popular"? it's still sourced to the Erin Brereton book, which said LANDQUAKE was popular. This was already discussed before. Implicit ≠ True, kinda thing. Also "Critics of the comic have said that the stories play directly to the fans of the Transformers conventions and stories center around the toys being introduced each year" looks, weird in that section. That's pretty much fact and how Fun Pub does things, nothing to do with what critics think. I'm just gonna remove that section. NotARealWord (talk) 18:33, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
- ...and I'm going to put it back in. We can discuss alternate wording though. Mathewignash (talk) 23:28, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
- It's not even all that true, they're not always all that popular. Most recent example, BotCon Galvatron sold for like £32.90 on eBay. There's also that BotCon 2010 sets BigBadToyStore is still trying to clearance, and Fun Pub had some Descent into Evil sets left over until what, 2009? Seriously, "extreemly popular" is not even true. Plus, the "extreemly" typo has never been corrected. NotARealWord (talk) 09:38, 6 September 2011 (UTC)