Blasius boundary layer: Difference between revisions
m Changed "must be solved numerically" to "can be solved numerically" - it is absurd to claim that one cannot get any sort of analytic solution |
→Falkner–Skan boundary layer: - Just noticed the same problem in this section - it is absurd to state, without proof, that an equation cannot be solved analytically. |
||
Line 99: | Line 99: | ||
(note that <math> m=0 </math> produces the Blasius equation). See Wilcox 2007. |
(note that <math> m=0 </math> produces the Blasius equation). See Wilcox 2007. |
||
This equation cannot be solved analytically and must be solved numerically. |
|||
In 1937 [[Douglas Hartree]] revealed that physical solutions exist only in the range <math> -0.0905 \le m \le 2 </math>. Here, m<0 corresponds to an adverse pressure gradient (often resulting in boundary layer separation) while m > 0 represents a favorable pressure gradient. |
In 1937 [[Douglas Hartree]] revealed that physical solutions exist only in the range <math> -0.0905 \le m \le 2 </math>. Here, m<0 corresponds to an adverse pressure gradient (often resulting in boundary layer separation) while m > 0 represents a favorable pressure gradient. |
Revision as of 15:51, 30 September 2011
In physics and fluid mechanics, a Blasius boundary layer (named after Paul Richard Heinrich Blasius) describes the steady two-dimensional boundary layer that forms on a semi-infinite plate which is held parallel to a constant unidirectional flow .
The solution to the Navier–Stokes equation for this flow begins with an order-of-magnitude analysis to determine what terms are important. Within the boundary layer the usual balance between viscosity and convective inertia is struck, resulting in the scaling argument
- ,
where is the boundary-layer thickness and is the kinematic viscosity.
However the semi-infinite plate has no natural length scale and so the steady, incompressible, two-dimensional boundary-layer equations for continuity and momentum are
Continuity:
x-Momentum:
(note that the x-independence of has been accounted for in the boundary-layer equations) admit a similarity solution. In the system of partial differential equations written above it is assumed that a fixed solid body wall is parallel to the x-direction whereas the y-direction is normal with respect to the fixed wall. and denote here the x- and y-components of the fluid velocity vector. Furthermore, from the scaling argument it is apparent that the boundary layer grows with the downstream coordinate , e.g.
This suggests adopting the similarity variable
and writing
It proves convenient to work with the stream function , in which case
and on differentiating, to find the velocities, and substituting into the boundary-layer equation we obtain the Blasius equation
subject to on and as . This non-linear ODE can be solved numerically, with the shooting method proving an effective choice. The shear stress on the plate
can then be computed. The numerical solution gives .
Falkner–Skan boundary layer
We can generalize the Blasius boundary layer by considering a wedge at an angle of attack from some uniform velocity field . We then estimate the outer flow to be of the form:
Where is a characteristic length and m is a dimensionless constant. In the Blasius solution, m = 0 corresponding to an angle of attack of zero radians. Thus we can write:
As in the Blasius solution, we use a similarity variable to solve the Navier-Stokes Equations.
It becomes easier to describe this in terms of its stream function which we write as
Thus the initial differential equation which was written as follows:
Can now be expressed in terms of the non-linear ODE known as the Falkner–Skan equation (named after V. M. Falkner and Sylvia W. Skan[1]).
(note that produces the Blasius equation). See Wilcox 2007.
In 1937 Douglas Hartree revealed that physical solutions exist only in the range . Here, m<0 corresponds to an adverse pressure gradient (often resulting in boundary layer separation) while m > 0 represents a favorable pressure gradient.
References
- ^ V. M. Falkner and S. W. Skan, Aero. Res. Coun. Rep. and Mem. no 1314, 1930.
- Schlichting, H. (2004), Boundary-Layer Theory, Springer. ISBN 3-540-66270-7
- Pozrikidis, C. (1998), Introduction to Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, Oxford. ISBN 0-19-509320-8
- Blasius, H. (1908), Grenzschichten in Flüssigkeiten mit kleiner Reibung, Z. Math. Phys. vol 56, pp. 1–37. http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/1950/naca-tm-1256.pdf (English translation)
- Liao, S.J. (1999), "An explicit, totally analytic approximation of Blasius' viscous flow problems", International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, 34 (4): 759–778, Bibcode:1999IJNLM..34..759L, doi:10.1016/S0020-7462(98)00056-0 (see homotopy analysis method)
- Liao, S.J.; Campo, A. (2002), "Analytic solutions of the temperature distribution in Blasius viscous flow problems", Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 453: 411–425, Bibcode:2002JFM...453..411L (see homotopy analysis method)
- Wilcox, David C. Basic Fluid Mechanics. DCW Industries Inc. 2007