User talk:Fetchcomms: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:03, 18 October 2011

HOME	TALK	USER
SAND	MISC	GUEST

to-do

File tagged for deletion - Simone Sello 2011.jpg

Hi Fetchcomms I will provide a standard request for permissions to Simonex4ever for forwarding to the photographer, so that OTRS approval may be obtained. I will send the form, tomorrow; and I will add the OTRS pending flag to the file description page. I am quite sure that the owner of the photo is willing to release. That particular step was missed in the process. Thank you for flagging it. Doc2234 (talk) 00:10, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. /ƒETCH COMMS / 00:47, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you

Thankyou for participating in my request for adminship. Now I've got lots of extra buttons to try and avoid pressing by mistake... Redrose64 (talk) 15:13, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Third Spirit of Christmas, giving you a glimpse of Hell

Hi Echo (The Editor Formerly Known as Fetchcomms):

I quoted my quotation of your suggestion for an interaction ban again at my RfC.

Hypoeuphorically, Kiefer.Wolfowitz 19:38, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, hope you're having a fun time with the whole thing :). /ƒETCH COMMS / 22:10, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fetchcomms!

I had enough sense to ignore two editors, and now it is a pity that I shall probably dismiss a 3rd, who had (on at least two occasions) corrected bone-head statements quickly after their wrongness became apparent (and on one occasion, did so freely, rather than as one in a series of apologies).

I had asked the critics to look at the context of my (offending) diffs, and to see whether my (perhaps uncivil?) diff was preceded by violations of AGF/NPA/civility by my accusers. I am happy to write that 28bytes did look. Cities have been spared on account of one honest man, we are told, so I am glad that Wikipedia has 28bytes.

Kiefer.Wolfowitz 16:37, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again,

I really think that you need to look at the RfC and either endorse the use of your name made by the accusers or suggest some caveats.

For example, it is suggested that you did not suggest an interaction ban, but only provided technical advice on how to ask for an interaction ban. ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=443713127 In reality, of course, you volunteered the suggestions of a 3-way interaction ban.)

Kiefer.Wolfowitz 13:03, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 30: / Line 30: @@
 ::I had asked the critics to look at the context of my (offending) diffs, and to see whether my (perhaps uncivil?) diff was preceded by violations of AGF/NPA/civility by my accusers. I am happy to write that 28bytes did look. Cities have been spared on account of one honest man, we are told, so I am glad that Wikipedia has 28bytes.
 ::<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Kiefer.Wolfowitz|<font style="color:blue;background:yellow;">&nbsp;'''Kiefer'''</font>]].[[User talk:Kiefer.Wolfowitz#top|Wolfowitz]]</span></small> 16:37, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
+Hi again,
+I really think that you need to look at the RfC and either endorse the use of your name made by the accusers or suggest some caveats.
+For example, it is suggested that you did not suggest an interaction ban, but only provided technical advice on how to ask for an interaction ban. ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=443713127 In reality, of course, you volunteered the suggestions of a ''3-way'' interaction ban.)
+<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Kiefer.Wolfowitz|<font style="color:blue;background:yellow;">&nbsp;'''Kiefer'''</font>]].[[User talk:Kiefer.Wolfowitz#top|Wolfowitz]]</span></small> 13:03, 18 October 2011 (UTC)