Talk:Ricker wavelet: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by 188.220.32.144 - "" |
suggest to rename |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Renaming to Ricker Wavelet == |
|||
Is it necessary to name this as the Mexican Hat Wavelet? It's more recognizable name is the Ricker Wavelet so perhaps this should be the official name. |
|||
== normalizing term == |
== normalizing term == |
||
Is the normalizing term correct there? i have coded this in matlab: |
Is the normalizing term correct there? i have coded this in matlab: |
||
Revision as of 18:04, 20 October 2011
Renaming to Ricker Wavelet
Is it necessary to name this as the Mexican Hat Wavelet? It's more recognizable name is the Ricker Wavelet so perhaps this should be the official name.
normalizing term
Is the normalizing term correct there? i have coded this in matlab: excit_function=sprintf('(1-((t-%e).^2/%e.^2)).*exp(-(t-%e).^2/(2*%e.^2))',5*ex_sigma,ex_sigma,5*ex_sigma,ex_sigma); t=0:dt:sim_time; excit=eval(excit_function); which is without the normalizing term and it correctly evaluates so that peak is +1 and not something like +10^27 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.220.32.144 (talk) 20:59, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
Lanczos resampling
This looks a lot like the kernel of Lanczos resampling. Is this just a superficial relationship? —Ben FrantzDale (talk) 21:32, 31 December 2007 (UTC) Yes, it's just resemblance, there's no relationship. crisluengo (talk) 07:50, 15 September 2009 (UTC)