Jump to content

Talk:OpenRISC 1200: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Created page with 'The history section was wrong, reflecting a confusion between the OpenRISC 1000 (which is an architectural specification for a family of processors) and the Open...'
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
== Performance ==

I'm not sure the performance figures are at all helpful, and in the absence of a citation, I find them very hard to believe. The OpenRISC typically runs on FPGA's clocked at 25-50MHz, although the latest FPGAs can wind that up closer to 100MHz. There are known issues with the implementation of the caches and MMUs that constrain performance. [[User:Jeremybennett|Jeremybennett]] ([[User talk:Jeremybennett|talk]]) 19:53, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

== History ==
The history section was wrong, reflecting a confusion between the OpenRISC 1000 (which is an architectural specification for a family of processors) and the OpenRISC 1200 which was the first implementation of that architecture. Text corrected. [[User:Jeremybennett|Jeremybennett]] ([[User talk:Jeremybennett|talk]]) 19:49, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
The history section was wrong, reflecting a confusion between the OpenRISC 1000 (which is an architectural specification for a family of processors) and the OpenRISC 1200 which was the first implementation of that architecture. Text corrected. [[User:Jeremybennett|Jeremybennett]] ([[User talk:Jeremybennett|talk]]) 19:49, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:53, 24 October 2011

Performance

I'm not sure the performance figures are at all helpful, and in the absence of a citation, I find them very hard to believe. The OpenRISC typically runs on FPGA's clocked at 25-50MHz, although the latest FPGAs can wind that up closer to 100MHz. There are known issues with the implementation of the caches and MMUs that constrain performance. Jeremybennett (talk) 19:53, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

History

The history section was wrong, reflecting a confusion between the OpenRISC 1000 (which is an architectural specification for a family of processors) and the OpenRISC 1200 which was the first implementation of that architecture. Text corrected. Jeremybennett (talk) 19:49, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]