Talk:Taiwan (island): Difference between revisions
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
Can someone please look through this template's history and pick out the bits that are accurate and relevant to this article? It was originally copied and pasted from this one (presumably to be able to cut down on text on this page), and, as such, is a clear violation of the GFDL. It needs to be deleted (and I have nominated it so). But if someone could pick out the useful bits which were added in the meantime, that would be great. [[User:Cormaggio|Cormaggio]] [[User talk:Cormaggio|<sup><small>@</small></sup>]] 00:55, 18 March 2006 (UTC) |
Can someone please look through this template's history and pick out the bits that are accurate and relevant to this article? It was originally copied and pasted from this one (presumably to be able to cut down on text on this page), and, as such, is a clear violation of the GFDL. It needs to be deleted (and I have nominated it so). But if someone could pick out the useful bits which were added in the meantime, that would be great. [[User:Cormaggio|Cormaggio]] [[User talk:Cormaggio|<sup><small>@</small></sup>]] 00:55, 18 March 2006 (UTC) |
||
== Ran's reverts == |
|||
Ran has been stubbornly reverting without examining the edits that I have been making, which have been modifications, clarifications, and compromises. On his side, however, he simply reverts without examination or comment. |
|||
On "island nation" POV: |
|||
- I added that China disagrees with this, as is well known. But Ran reverted anyways. |
|||
On "Democratic Transistion": |
|||
- I changed this subheading because it includes both the period of transition AND the current democratic error. His change to "Democratic Transistion" is erroneous. |
|||
On Chen's abolishment of NUC: |
|||
- I changed the grammar so that it is correct. Neither the original version nor Ran's version was correct. He ignored this and simply reverted. |
|||
There are other changes that could be talked about, but overall, you can look in the history and see that I was doing a series of edits that were not simple reverts, yet Ran was simply reverting every time.[[User:Moveapage|Moveapage]] 21:24, 27 March 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 21:24, 27 March 2006
Infobox
It is so sad. You can't say your name out.
What's wrong with this anyways?
"Facing tremendous pressure from the PRC, the ROC uses the name Chinese Taipei in the Olympics and other international events, usually of which PRC is also a party. The ROC is also barred from using its national anthem and national flag in international events due to PRC pressure. PRC's pressure goes even further by barring Taiwanese spectators attending events such as the Olympics from bringing ROC national flags into Olympic venues." This entire paragraph is POV, insinuating that EVERY country refuses to recognize the ROC claim on the basis of PRC pressure alone - one country dissenting from this renders this POV.
Can someone please look through this template's history and pick out the bits that are accurate and relevant to this article? It was originally copied and pasted from this one (presumably to be able to cut down on text on this page), and, as such, is a clear violation of the GFDL. It needs to be deleted (and I have nominated it so). But if someone could pick out the useful bits which were added in the meantime, that would be great. Cormaggio @ 00:55, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
Ran's reverts
Ran has been stubbornly reverting without examining the edits that I have been making, which have been modifications, clarifications, and compromises. On his side, however, he simply reverts without examination or comment.
On "island nation" POV: - I added that China disagrees with this, as is well known. But Ran reverted anyways.
On "Democratic Transistion": - I changed this subheading because it includes both the period of transition AND the current democratic error. His change to "Democratic Transistion" is erroneous.
On Chen's abolishment of NUC: - I changed the grammar so that it is correct. Neither the original version nor Ran's version was correct. He ignored this and simply reverted.
There are other changes that could be talked about, but overall, you can look in the history and see that I was doing a series of edits that were not simple reverts, yet Ran was simply reverting every time.Moveapage 21:24, 27 March 2006 (UTC)