Talk:Airwatt: Difference between revisions
← Created page with 'I added a bit to explain that airwatts are more direct measurements of vaccuum system power than electrical draw, because the system has inefficiencies which vary....' |
→Formula: new section |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I added a bit to explain that airwatts are more direct measurements of vaccuum system power than electrical draw, because the system has inefficiencies which vary.[[Special:Contributions/67.184.72.52|67.184.72.52]] ([[User talk:67.184.72.52|talk]]) 22:28, 18 August 2008 (UTC) |
I added a bit to explain that airwatts are more direct measurements of vaccuum system power than electrical draw, because the system has inefficiencies which vary.[[Special:Contributions/67.184.72.52|67.184.72.52]] ([[User talk:67.184.72.52|talk]]) 22:28, 18 August 2008 (UTC) |
||
== Formula == |
|||
There were a few paragraphs in the formula section that referenced charts that were not in the article. The paragraphs were copied over from the Vacuum Cleaner article. I checked the history of that article and found that the charts referred to were not present and never were. It looks as if these paragraphs were copied from another source, word for word, without changing them to reflect that there were no charts with which to refer. There was also no source listed so the charts could not be added. As these paragraphs depended heavily on the charts (and make no sense without them), they have been removed. If the paragraphs are added back in, references to the charts should be removed and the explanation should be changed to not depend on them. Also, it should be moved out of the Formula section. |
|||
Revision as of 13:01, 2 November 2011
I added a bit to explain that airwatts are more direct measurements of vaccuum system power than electrical draw, because the system has inefficiencies which vary.67.184.72.52 (talk) 22:28, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Formula
There were a few paragraphs in the formula section that referenced charts that were not in the article. The paragraphs were copied over from the Vacuum Cleaner article. I checked the history of that article and found that the charts referred to were not present and never were. It looks as if these paragraphs were copied from another source, word for word, without changing them to reflect that there were no charts with which to refer. There was also no source listed so the charts could not be added. As these paragraphs depended heavily on the charts (and make no sense without them), they have been removed. If the paragraphs are added back in, references to the charts should be removed and the explanation should be changed to not depend on them. Also, it should be moved out of the Formula section.