Jump to content

Talk:Economic indicator: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Rated C-Class
Line 3: Line 3:
==Question==
==Question==
want to know all the major factors of the economic right now in the united states.
want to know all the major factors of the economic right now in the united states.

==Question about meaning==
There is no discussion about the meaning and relationship between jobs created per month and total jobless claims? This statistic "weekly jobless claims" is given but not defined.

"Average weekly jobless claims for unemployment insurance - The CB reverses the value of this component from positive to negative because a positive reading indicates a loss in jobs."


==Don't merge Leading Indicator==
==Don't merge Leading Indicator==

Revision as of 15:36, 5 November 2011

WikiProject iconEconomics C‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Question

want to know all the major factors of the economic right now in the united states.

Question about meaning

There is no discussion about the meaning and relationship between jobs created per month and total jobless claims? This statistic "weekly jobless claims" is given but not defined.

"Average weekly jobless claims for unemployment insurance - The CB reverses the value of this component from positive to negative because a positive reading indicates a loss in jobs."

Don't merge Leading Indicator

Leading Indicator: "It has been suggested that this article or section be merged into Economic indicator. (Discuss)" - Not a good idea- 'Leading Indicators' is an indicator released for practically all economies. Although it is a composite indicators put together with government and non-government data, it still is cited by policy makers and analysts. thus I'd put it into the same catagory and U Of Mich Conf and ISM Surveys; although not really a govt indicator, still important to following the economcy. -

See my comments here. --JHP (talk) 04:29, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposals

I am reopening the merge proposal. This article already discusses leading, lagging, and coincident economic indicators, so I suggest moving those short articles into this one. All four articles discuss economic indicators. The only thing special about a leading indicator is that it leads. The only thing special about a lagging indicator is that it lags. The only thing special about a coincident indicator is that it reflects current economic performance. All these properties can easily be covered in this article. --JHP (talk) 20:14, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merges implemented. -- Beland (talk) 05:16, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]