Talk:Miss Lonelyhearts: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 04:11, 19 November 2011

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Novels Stub‑class Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The Major Themes Section is Terrible

It really is. That anyone could read this little book and find anything in it involving, even by implication, either the Situationist or Marxist concepts of "alienation" of modern man due to commodification and specialization and etc etc etc, is kind of amazing. It's obviously a kind of wise-ass Dostoevsky novel in miniature. It's not about the causes of alienation. It's about seemingly inherent alienation, and more than that, it's about human suffering and loneliness. And about suffering over human suffering, and about the search for solutions to it. The book - correctly - says there are no solutions but God, ie Christ-like love and sympathy and kindness. But it then shows that modern men have real problems buying in. It isn't that complicated. Also, to the earlier writer on this page (and to any critic), I don't know any more about him than these two books and the basic biographical info available on Wikipedia, but if this book is any indication, West wasn't a nihilist any more than Dostoevsky was. Nihilists don't suffer over their nihilism. Hoping God exists and weeping over seemingly pointless suffering is not nihilistic. I read West the same way I read Dostoevsky, albeit West seems to have been much more depressive and to have had less hope, or to have found it even more difficult than FD to truly believe or pretend to believe. But clearly both men's knowledge (which was nihilistic and bleak) had to work against their hope, which was Christian.

the whole "keys longing to mix with change" passage is genius. this work is very underappreciated.

just one fool's opinion

joe g

www.flimshaw.blogspot.com

Most critics find this novel just as important as Day of the Locust, it is less episodic and presents a more complete view of West's nihilism (in the chapter "Miss Lonelyhearts in the Dismal swamp"). Beautifully concise writing and precise language. AshcroftIleum 04:28, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

my favourite book.

Some of these bits that need citations are oversimplifications of scenes that appear in the book ("Ironically, he is shot at the moment he thinks he has had a religious conversion"... nowhere in the book does it state that Miss Lonelyhearts is injured in the last scene). I'll remove them if no one objects. 128.135.100.102 (talk) 23:03, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 04:11, 19 November 2011 edit 98.227.77.90 (talk) No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 04:11, 19 November 2011 edit undo 98.227.77.90 (talk) →‎The Major Themes Section is Terrible Next edit →
Line 2:		Line 2:

	==The Major Themes Section is Terrible==		==The Major Themes Section is Terrible==
	It really is. That anyone could read this little book and find anything in it involving, even by implication, either the Situationist or Marxist concepts of "alienation" due to ~~commodication~~ and ~~modern~~ ~~society,~~ etc etc etc, is kind of amazing. It's obviously a kind of wise-ass Dostoevsky novel in miniature. It's not about the causes of alienation. It's about seemingly inherent alienation, and more than that, it's about human suffering and loneliness. And about suffering over human suffering, and about the search for solutions to it. The book - correctly - says there are no solutions but God, ie Christ-like love and sympathy and kindness. But it then shows that modern men have real problems buying in. It isn't that complicated. Also, to the earlier writer on this page (and to any critic), I don't know any more about him than these two books and the basic biographical info available on Wikipedia, but if this book is any indication, West wasn't a nihilist any more than Dostoevsky was. Nihilists don't suffer over their nihilism. Hoping God exists and weeping over seemingly pointless suffering is not nihilistic. I read West the same way I read Dostoevsky, albeit West seems to have been much more depressive and to have had less hope, or to have found it even more difficult than FD to truly believe or pretend to believe. But clearly both men's knowledge (which was nihilistic and bleak) had to work against their hope, which was Christian.		It really is. That anyone could read this little book and find anything in it involving, even by implication, either the Situationist or Marxist concepts of "alienation" of modern man due to commodification and specialization and etc etc etc, is kind of amazing. It's obviously a kind of wise-ass Dostoevsky novel in miniature. It's not about the causes of alienation. It's about seemingly inherent alienation, and more than that, it's about human suffering and loneliness. And about suffering over human suffering, and about the search for solutions to it. The book - correctly - says there are no solutions but God, ie Christ-like love and sympathy and kindness. But it then shows that modern men have real problems buying in. It isn't that complicated. Also, to the earlier writer on this page (and to any critic), I don't know any more about him than these two books and the basic biographical info available on Wikipedia, but if this book is any indication, West wasn't a nihilist any more than Dostoevsky was. Nihilists don't suffer over their nihilism. Hoping God exists and weeping over seemingly pointless suffering is not nihilistic. I read West the same way I read Dostoevsky, albeit West seems to have been much more depressive and to have had less hope, or to have found it even more difficult than FD to truly believe or pretend to believe. But clearly both men's knowledge (which was nihilistic and bleak) had to work against their hope, which was Christian.