Jump to content

User talk:WalkerThrough: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
re-blocked
Once again, unfairly blocked
Line 3: Line 3:


Since you have chosen to reinsert false claims and use your talk page for polemic attacks on others, something we didn't want to see, I am revoking the granted appeal from BASC and reblocking the account. [[User:SirFozzie|SirFozzie]] ([[User talk:SirFozzie|talk]]) 21:26, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Since you have chosen to reinsert false claims and use your talk page for polemic attacks on others, something we didn't want to see, I am revoking the granted appeal from BASC and reblocking the account. [[User:SirFozzie|SirFozzie]] ([[User talk:SirFozzie|talk]]) 21:26, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
::It appears that I have been reblocked after I gave thanks to my great God and Savior, Jesus Christ, on my personal pages, unarchived things, and thanked other editors for standing with me when I was being unfairly attacked. I also explained what I meant about my past actions regarding POV, which were never proven to have broken policy. Why should I be indef blocked again for this? This is getting ridiculous. I have stated that I don't think it would be good for me to edit WP right now, but that doesn't mean forever. I'm hopeful at the right time in the future, and I don't know how long or short that could be, that I could resume editing. SirFozzie has blocked me for violating the terms of my unblock, bearing false witness, and attacking others. However, I haven't edited any articles. The terms of my unblock are only about editing articles. So again, that is not right. He also said I am bearing false witness, but I haven't done this a single time. Neither have I been attacking others. I simply unarchived some things that others put in archive when I did not have the ability to edit my talk page. It's my own talk page, and WP says that I can edit that. This is once again, very unfair. How can WP have a viable community if true justice is not upheld? [[User:WalkerThrough|WalkerThrough]] ([[User talk:WalkerThrough#top|talk]]) 22:10, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:10, 22 November 2011

Template:Indefblock


Since you have chosen to reinsert false claims and use your talk page for polemic attacks on others, something we didn't want to see, I am revoking the granted appeal from BASC and reblocking the account. SirFozzie (talk) 21:26, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that I have been reblocked after I gave thanks to my great God and Savior, Jesus Christ, on my personal pages, unarchived things, and thanked other editors for standing with me when I was being unfairly attacked. I also explained what I meant about my past actions regarding POV, which were never proven to have broken policy. Why should I be indef blocked again for this? This is getting ridiculous. I have stated that I don't think it would be good for me to edit WP right now, but that doesn't mean forever. I'm hopeful at the right time in the future, and I don't know how long or short that could be, that I could resume editing. SirFozzie has blocked me for violating the terms of my unblock, bearing false witness, and attacking others. However, I haven't edited any articles. The terms of my unblock are only about editing articles. So again, that is not right. He also said I am bearing false witness, but I haven't done this a single time. Neither have I been attacking others. I simply unarchived some things that others put in archive when I did not have the ability to edit my talk page. It's my own talk page, and WP says that I can edit that. This is once again, very unfair. How can WP have a viable community if true justice is not upheld? WalkerThrough (talk) 22:10, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]