User talk:Em-jay-es/sandbox: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by Em-jay-es - "" |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Thank you, random bot, for signing my posting on this sandbox! <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Em-jay-es|Em-jay-es]] ([[User talk:Em-jay-es|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Em-jay-es|contribs]]) 01:29, 18 December 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Thank you, random bot, for signing my posting on this sandbox! <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Em-jay-es|Em-jay-es]] ([[User talk:Em-jay-es|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Em-jay-es|contribs]]) 01:29, 18 December 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
Thanks again! {{Unsigned}} |
|||
Revision as of 03:48, 18 December 2011
History, what is it?
Recourse to the past to justify the present. Does this have be be causal? Does the creation of history come about simply because of a conflict? Can it be enlisted to maintain a status quo? The question of what is history (?) is dependent upon who is writing, who is reading and when the body of literature is being produced. Otherwise, the definition of history becomes anachronistic and subjective. </ref>
In the spirit of faux pluralism, a facebook acquaintance — Preceding unsigned comment added by Em-jay-es (talk • contribs) 00:14, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Thank you, random bot, for signing my posting on this sandbox! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Em-jay-es (talk • contribs) 01:29, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Thanks again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]])