Jump to content

Talk:Galaxy groups and clusters: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Notification of possible deletion of File:Galaxy.group.hickson.arp.500pix.jpg (Version r82)
Line 23: Line 23:
''This notification is provided by a Bot'' --[[User:CommonsNotificationBot|CommonsNotificationBot]] ([[User talk:CommonsNotificationBot|talk]]) 15:24, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
''This notification is provided by a Bot'' --[[User:CommonsNotificationBot|CommonsNotificationBot]] ([[User talk:CommonsNotificationBot|talk]]) 15:24, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
|}
|}

== Proposal to merge [[Galaxy clusters]] into this page ==

There's really no need to have multiple pages on groups and clusters, as they differ only in size, and there's no sharp physical change. (Historically, clusters could be detected without redshift information, while groups couldn't, but almost all data today uses redshift information for cluster detection anyway.) It makes more sense to me to have a single article covering groups and clusters of all mass ranges. --[[User:Infophile|Infophile]] <sup>[[User_talk:Infophile|(Talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Infophile|(Contribs)]]</sup> 19:01, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:01, 4 January 2012

WikiProject iconAstronomy: Astronomical objects Start‑class Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.

Expansion

A list of members for each group and cluster is a good start, but I think it would be more useful to give distances and locations, plus maybe diameters. Anyone have access to that sort of information? My books are all back in Calgary. --Josh Grosse

All this information came from the internet. Article is a work in progress feel free to add information. Very difficult to find complete information for some of these groups. Mathew Carrier

Entropy

I think there is a better place for the entropy calculation somewhere else. It is not done correctly anyway. Oth (talk) 18:12, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How does one calculate the number of galaxy groups or clusters? or super-clusters of galaxies? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Quaker phil (talkcontribs) 22:55, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Galaxy.group.hickson.arp.500pix.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Galaxy.group.hickson.arp.500pix.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:24, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal to merge Galaxy clusters into this page

There's really no need to have multiple pages on groups and clusters, as they differ only in size, and there's no sharp physical change. (Historically, clusters could be detected without redshift information, while groups couldn't, but almost all data today uses redshift information for cluster detection anyway.) It makes more sense to me to have a single article covering groups and clusters of all mass ranges. --Infophile (Talk) (Contribs) 19:01, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]