Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emily Oster: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:10, 4 April 2006

Lots of people get Ph.D.s, I do not see why this one is in any way notable. (Perhaps because I do not know what the missing women problem is?) Austrian 20:23, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom James Kendall [talk] 20:30, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; could be speedied as nn-bio. bikeable (talk) 20:37, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]. You know, if the nominator has simply googled "missing women problem" [8] (a better choice than announcing one's own ignorance on a matter and proceeding without researching) this could have been avoided. Monicasdude 21:10, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 * '''Delete''' per nom <i><font color="green">[[User:James.kendall| James]]</font> <font color="purple">[[User:James.kendall| Kendall]]</font></i> [[User_talk:James.kendall| [talk]]] 20:30, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
 * '''Delete'''; could be '''speedied''' as nn-bio.  [[User:Bikeable|bikeable]] [[User talk:Bikeable|(talk)]] 20:37, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
+*'''Speedy Keep'''. [http://www.slate.com/id/2119402/] [http://www.marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2005/02/where_are_asias.html] [http://www.johnhawks.net/weblog/topics/biotech/hep_b_sex_ratio_2005.w] [http://www.rightreality.com/recent_articles/treating_hiv_doesnt_pay_.html] [http://www.ourkarnataka.com/Articles/starofmysore/vanishingwomen.htm] [http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medicalnews.php?newsid=33366] [http://query.nytimes.com/search/query?query=%22emily+oster%22&srchst=nyt]. You know, if the nominator has simply googled "missing women problem" [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&c2coff=1&q=%22missing+women+problem%22&btnG=Search] (a better choice than announcing one's own ignorance on a matter and  proceeding without researching) this could have been avoided. [[User:Monicasdude|Monicasdude]] 21:10, 4 April 2006 (UTC)