Jump to content

Talk:Tara (plantation): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SUNY Boy (talk | contribs)
Line 10: Line 10:


Che, are you the person who is mediating this dispute?[[User:24.45.196.36|24.45.196.36]] 22:23, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Che, are you the person who is mediating this dispute?[[User:24.45.196.36|24.45.196.36]] 22:23, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

I hope that the latest information puts a rest to the controversy once and for all. It is no wonder there was much debate over this issue.[[User:SUNY Boy|SUNY Boy]] ([[User talk:SUNY Boy|talk]]) 04:20, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:20, 8 January 2012

WikiProject iconNovels Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tara set at Selznick studios

It is indisputable fact that the Tara set was built at Selznick International Pictures, not M-G-M, and that the set was sold, dismantled, and sent to Georgia in 1959. I have provided excellent reference citations for this, from both 1959 and today. If you believe there is a story in the Los Angeles Times that claims the Tara set was at M-G-M and was demolished in the early 1980s, it is your obligation to provide a reference citation to that article. — Walloon 04:39, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Walloon is correct on this point -- the information there now is sufficiently sourced. If you would like to challenge that, you need to provide, not just point to, a reliable source which disputes it. - Che Nuevara 19:28, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Che, are you the person who is mediating this dispute?24.45.196.36 22:23, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I hope that the latest information puts a rest to the controversy once and for all. It is no wonder there was much debate over this issue.SUNY Boy (talk) 04:20, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]