Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Doyle: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:30, 5 April 2006

Brian Doyle

He is only notable for an accusation of a crime. This is a wikinews item, not an encyclopedia item. The article didn't exist until his arrest. Move to Wikinews. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tbeatty (talk • contribs)

See discussion on Lauren B. Weiner for similiarity.--Tbeatty 17:08, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep in the news and completely verifiable. Meets WP:BIO. --W.marsh 17:02, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikinews, NN. Do not believe this meets WP:BIO. Bridesmill 17:15, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Transwiki to WikiNews as nominated and delete. Brian G. Crawford 17:35, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, and all votes containing "NN" should be ignored, notability is nebulous and not a criteria for keeping or deleting. Instead we are to focus on what is encyclopedic, which this guy is, was and shall be. Sam Spade 17:42, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- One of my reasons was "unencyclopedic". It isn't clear to me how this person is encyclopedic so this is why I listed it. He is definitely news, but since he wasn't "encyclopedic" before the arrest, what makes it so now? --Tbeatty 18:01, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- My point is that he (as deputy press secretary for the United States Department of Homeland Security) was notable before this article was created. Sam Spade 18:24, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Transwiki to Wikinews, this is an ongoing matter, not an ecyclopedic issue. JoshuaZ 18:13, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Transwiki to Wikinews. It is certainly news, but, other then this issue, it doesn't really seem like there would be anything else worth noting. --Inaxdaze 18:30, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 **My point is that he (as deputy press secretary for the United States Department of Homeland Security) was notable before this article was created. [[User:Sam Spade|Sam Spade]] 18:24, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
 *'''Transwiki''' to Wikinews, this is an ongoing matter, not an ecyclopedic issue. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 18:13, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
+*Transwiki to Wikinews. It is certainly news, but, other then this issue, it doesn't really seem like there would be anything else worth noting. --[[User:Inaxdaze|Inaxdaze]] 18:30, 5 April 2006 (UTC)