User talk:Sathishmls

The "safer alternatives" section is completely out of context with this article. I suggest you add those in articles related to nuclear energy or alternative energy not in an article related to a specific nuclear reactor. The protests are too detailed to be in this article but I will not remove them now (except for the hyperlink). Kindly dont add links that direct to third party websites. Castroby (talk) 10:47, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Hi Sathish if you intend adding more content regarding the ongoing protests can you kindly create a new wikipedia article exclusively on the protests, then we can leave few lines in the main article under the controversy section and add a link to the new article to get more information about the protests. Castroby (talk) 14:12, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

I have no intention of adding anymore to this section. I added the points from the trusted sources to the maintain the NPOV. Sathishmls (talk) 08:32, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors, which you did not on Article. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. I had added right references, Can you please tell me what rules did my post violated? I added correct references too. AMuraliKumar (talk) 11:03, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi AMuraliKumar, The reason why i reverted was mainly due to 2 things

1. Rearranging of the words and making it false in the controversy section that only fisherman are protesting.

2. Removing many sourced contents like protestors stated points ref, udhaykumar comments on the plant, homi sethna's comments on kalam see the diff [[1]]
Sathishmls (talk) 06:32, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi Sathish You appear to have hijacked the article on Kudankulam power plant. I must say that the article is quite strongly biased in favour of the protesters. I have tried to give it a neutral tone, and you have said it is a vandalisation! Please explain. Thank you for your patience. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nashtam (talk • contribs) 12:52, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi, You have removed almost all the verified content without any discussion. Hence i reverted them. Sathishmls (talk) 13:10, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi Sathish Alright then. Let us discuss each item in detail. Am ready to spare time for this because I think it is an important issue that will decide the future of my country. How do we proceed in doing this discussion. Many thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nashtam (talk • contribs) 13:15, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

All the points in the article has been already discussion with many persons and formed and have been for a long time. Sathishmls (talk) 13:33, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Sathish, Please feel free to discuss the changes on the article's talk page. I will make it a point to respond promptly on the matter. Thanks for your cooperation and patience in this matter. Nashtam (talk) 15:04, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

I think it is only fair to inform you that I have raised the matter in the Wikipedia Neutrality Noticeboard. It will be interesting to see whether wikipedia has enough flexibility to deal with things of this nature. I hope you realise that by your actions you seem to be indicating that most of the senior people in the Indian government including the Prime Minister, Home Minister etc. are liars. Is that something wikipedia is ok with? Nashtam (talk) 07:01, 1 March 2012 (UTC)