Jump to content

User talk:RmanB17499: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
govt article: new section
Line 7: Line 7:


Just a friendly warning (not an official warning at all), I believe you do not currently have consensus for your change (somewhat obvious as it keeps getting reverted), and since you have multiple people reverting against you, you are likely to come up against [[WP:3RR]] quite quickly and risk getting blocked or otherwise reprimanded for edit warring. I believe ultimately you can prevail in your argument, as the treaties etc are good (although [[WP:PRIMARYSOURCES]]. perhaps adding "federal" outside the qquotes to keep the flow the same but just have the bold part be the official name?[[User:Gaijin42|Gaijin42]] ([[User talk:Gaijin42|talk]]) 19:23, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Just a friendly warning (not an official warning at all), I believe you do not currently have consensus for your change (somewhat obvious as it keeps getting reverted), and since you have multiple people reverting against you, you are likely to come up against [[WP:3RR]] quite quickly and risk getting blocked or otherwise reprimanded for edit warring. I believe ultimately you can prevail in your argument, as the treaties etc are good (although [[WP:PRIMARYSOURCES]]. perhaps adding "federal" outside the qquotes to keep the flow the same but just have the bold part be the official name?[[User:Gaijin42|Gaijin42]] ([[User talk:Gaijin42|talk]]) 19:23, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Sounds good to me, sir.

Revision as of 19:34, 14 March 2012

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:05, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks...will do (RmanB17499 (talk) 20:22, 13 March 2012 (UTC)RmanB17499RmanB17499 (talk) 20:22, 13 March 2012 (UTC))[reply]

govt article

Just a friendly warning (not an official warning at all), I believe you do not currently have consensus for your change (somewhat obvious as it keeps getting reverted), and since you have multiple people reverting against you, you are likely to come up against WP:3RR quite quickly and risk getting blocked or otherwise reprimanded for edit warring. I believe ultimately you can prevail in your argument, as the treaties etc are good (although WP:PRIMARYSOURCES. perhaps adding "federal" outside the qquotes to keep the flow the same but just have the bold part be the official name?Gaijin42 (talk) 19:23, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good to me, sir.