Jump to content

Talk:Skewness: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
MateoP (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
HOW ABOUT A POSITIVE SKEW VERSES NEGATIVE SKEW PICTURE

The statement about unbiasedness of the estimate of skewness given needs further qualification for two reasons.
The statement about unbiasedness of the estimate of skewness given needs further qualification for two reasons.



Revision as of 13:08, 17 April 2006

HOW ABOUT A POSITIVE SKEW VERSES NEGATIVE SKEW PICTURE

The statement about unbiasedness of the estimate of skewness given needs further qualification for two reasons.

Firstly, if the sample is from a finite population the observations are dependent, while the proof of unbiasedness requires independence.

Secondly, the standardised third moment is a ratio. It is usually impossible that the expectation of a ratio can be written in a simple form that generalises to all distributions. In fact the estimator for the central third moment in the numerator is unbiased, and the variance in the denominator is unbiased (but its 3/2 power is biased). [It is well known that the square root of the sample variance--the sample standard deviation--is biased; there is a correction for bias for specific distributions, but no general correction.] By the linearisation method (or delta method) we can say that the ratio is approximately unbiased. User:Terry Moore 11 Jun 2005


Adding two graphs here to illustrate visually the difference between left and right skew would be enormously beneficial. I got them confused until someone drew it on the board in stats class.

Needs better intro

Almost impossible for a lay person without knowledge of statistics to understand this article. There needs to be a more general introduction given. --MateoP 21:52, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]