Jump to content

Talk:India at the 2011 Commonwealth Youth Games/GA1: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 16: Line 16:
{{GATable/item|1a|?|
{{GATable/item|1a|?|
}}
}}
*Unlink "previous Commonwealth Youth games", as I've asked you to link it in the lede.
*Unlink "previous Commonwealth Youth games", as I've asked you to link it in the lede.
*Change "only multiple medals winning" to "only multiple medal winning", remove 's'.
*Change "only multiple medals winning" to "only multiple medal winning", remove 's'.
*Change "Another medallist from Indian side" to " Another medallist from the Indian side".
*Change "Another medallist from Indian side" to " Another medallist from the Indian side".

Revision as of 14:48, 28 April 2012

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: EarthShocker (talk · contribs) 13:48, 28 April 2012 (UTC) ⓔⓐⓡⓣⓗ ⓢⓗⓞ©ⓚⓔⓡ (talk) 13:48, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
  • Unlink "previous Commonwealth Youth games", as I've asked you to link it in the lede.
  • Change "only multiple medals winning" to "only multiple medal winning", remove 's'.
  • Change "Another medallist from Indian side" to " Another medallist from the Indian side".
  • Is there any need to have those red links in the article?
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
  • Link "Previous Commonwealth Youth games " to the page of games.
  • "edition" is more proper word than "revision".
  • Use "twenty", if you are using "twelve men and eight women" or change all to their numeral form only.
  • The article is not that large, so I don't think that you need to link Malaysia twice.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
7. Overall assessment.