Talk:Forward (Obama–Biden campaign slogan): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
*cough* |
||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
'''Keep''' It can't be denied that it's relevant, and factual, and significant.[[Special:Contributions/130.111.163.179|130.111.163.179]] ([[User talk:130.111.163.179|talk]]) 16:47, 2 May 2012 (UTC) |
'''Keep''' It can't be denied that it's relevant, and factual, and significant.[[Special:Contributions/130.111.163.179|130.111.163.179]] ([[User talk:130.111.163.179|talk]]) 16:47, 2 May 2012 (UTC) |
||
* *cough* Ahem...[[WP:NPOV]] exists... [[Special:Contributions/71.175.53.239|71.175.53.239]] ([[User talk:71.175.53.239|talk]]) 16:49, 2 May 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:49, 2 May 2012
On 2 May 2012, Forward (Obama–Biden campaign slogan) was linked from Drudge Report, a high-traffic website. (Traffic) All prior and subsequent edits to the article are noted in its revision history. |
It figures wikipedia would delete this. After all, most media outlets are in the sack with the "Forward Ones".
This word has long been used by so many other socialists of which Nobama ia a democrat socialist.
Shame on you wikipedia...
- First, the talk page is for discussing what should be done with the page. It is not an outlet for a personal monologue.
- Second, please use proper spelling.
- Third, each topic should be placed in an individual section. This can be done simply by clicking the “new section” tab at the top of your screen.
- Finally, you should sign your posts with four tildes - because this is the worst designed website for collaboration in the history of the internet and like...four tildes man, makes a ton of sense.
Stanislao Avogadro (talk) 02:17, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
OK, Stanislao (really? Stanislao? Isn't this English Wikipedia?) here is the "discussion" about what should be done with this page: LEAVE IT!
This entry should stay. While it may be inconvenient to leftists and American Democrats, it documents a historical fact: the phrase "Forward!", which Obama is using in his re-election has a long and distinguished history in the social movement. Deleting this entry instead of cleaning it up, just shows that people (and Wikipedia) don't want to deal with "inconvenient truths" that hurt their cause. Please Leave it. Uneven Steven (talk) 16:25, 2 May 2012 (UTC)Uneven Steven
This entry should stay. While it may be inconvenient to leftists and American Democrats, it documents a historical fact: the phrase "Forward!", which Obama is using in his re-election has a long and distinguished history in the social movement. Deleting this entry instead of cleaning it up, just shows that people (and Wikipedia) don't want to deal with "inconvenient truths" that hurt their cause. Please Leave it. Uneven Steven (talk) 16:25, 2 May 2012 (UTC)Uneven Steven
Regardless of your political persuasion and whether the linkage of Obama's campaign to Socialism is inconvenient to you, the following facts are undisputable:
1) Obama selected "FORWARD" as his campaign slogan
2) "FORWARD" has been historically used by Socialist and Communist publications on numerous occasions — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.176.16.8 (talk) 15:11, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Well well well...go figure. And I thought Wikipedia was apolitical...I guess not! I am sorely dissapointed but can't say that I am surprised. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Whatsupdaddio (talk • contribs) 15:56, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Oh no, no, no... Wikipedia is NOT apolitical. They lean LEFT. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.37.249.172 (talk) 16:30, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Obama continuing to use "Forward" means it should stay. Him dropping its use means it should stay and then just add the fact that he quit using it. After all, that would be the truth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.138.62.36 (talk) 16:11, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Keep It can't be denied that it's relevant, and factual, and significant.130.111.163.179 (talk) 16:47, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
- *cough* Ahem...WP:NPOV exists... 71.175.53.239 (talk) 16:49, 2 May 2012 (UTC)