Talk:Brad Wall: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
[[User:64.110.251.69|64.110.251.69]] 16:12, 10 April 2006 (UTC) |
[[User:64.110.251.69|64.110.251.69]] 16:12, 10 April 2006 (UTC) |
||
If this is the case than the part about what happned under Devine both negative and positive should not be in the article about Brad Wall. |
|||
== Sad. == |
== Sad. == |
||
Revision as of 00:46, 21 April 2006
Slight NPOV alterations. Any bugger who can come up with stuff like that "Mouseland" parody doesn't deserve a rhetorical fellation. Wareq 02:11, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
Fellation? I beg your pardon? Please show any mistruths to the material you removed, or I will keep re-instating it.
64.110.251.69 02:57, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
To User:24.66.94.140 :
Your points might be better accomplished, rather than posting untrue libels towards Brad, by coming up with a page for John Gerich, including mention of his conviction for fraud. Maybe even call up Andrew Thomson and get a copy of that memo he has been talking about recently in the Legislature where the Liquor Board is ordered, in the early 90s, to deliver copius quantities of free liquor to Gerich's office. Wikipedia accepts images, but you have to sign up for an account.
Brad was barely even in his mid 20s when the Devine PC's left office, and most certainly was not in a position of authority. In many cases, the Devine PC's flouted the law (ie: retroactive legislation of the harmonized PST) -- you expect they would have given influence to a 23-year-old new hire?
64.110.251.69 16:12, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
If this is the case than the part about what happned under Devine both negative and positive should not be in the article about Brad Wall.
Sad.
It now seems abundantly clear that someone who has fond memories of the Devine era has taken upon him/herself to go through Wikipedia and make it seem as though EVERYBODY has fond memories of the period. In the process, the culprit has single-handedly dragged the quality of Wikipedia down.
Truth be told, it is almost an honourable effort. The blatant lack of regard for the standards/guidelines of Wikipedia is evidence of someone who does not even find it necessary to hide such unabashed bias in subtlety or clever nuance. In fact, I suspect that this 'article' was simply lifted from some sort of official bio of Wall (suggesting it is not sourced - another no-no).
Bad Link
The above link for Andrew Thompson is incorrect and makes no mention of the saskatchewan finance minister, only a football player and an ontario politician. Please fix this.