Veil of ignorance: Difference between revisions
m ISBNs (Build KH) |
Minor edit |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The ''veil of ignorance'' blocks off this knowledge, such that one does not know what burdens and benefits of social cooperation might fall to him/her once the veil is lifted. With this knowledge blocked, parties to the original position must decide on principles for the distribution of rights, positions and resources in their society. As Rawls put it, "...no one knows his place in society, his class position or social status; nor does he know his fortune in the distribution of natural assets and abilities, his intelligence and strength, and the like."<ref>{{cite book | title = A Theory of Justice | first = John | last = Rawls | authorlink = John Rawls | publisher = [[Harvard University Press]] | year = 1999 | page = 118 | isbn = 0-674-00078-1 }}</ref> The idea then, is to render moot those personal considerations that are morally irrelevant to the justice or injustice of principles meant to allocate the benefits of social cooperation. |
The ''veil of ignorance'' blocks off this knowledge, such that one does not know what burdens and benefits of social cooperation might fall to him/her once the veil is lifted. With this knowledge blocked, parties to the original position must decide on principles for the distribution of rights, positions and resources in their society. As Rawls put it, "...no one knows his place in society, his class position or social status; nor does he know his fortune in the distribution of natural assets and abilities, his intelligence and strength, and the like."<ref>{{cite book | title = A Theory of Justice | first = John | last = Rawls | authorlink = John Rawls | publisher = [[Harvard University Press]] | year = 1999 | page = 118 | isbn = 0-674-00078-1 }}</ref> The idea then, is to render moot those personal considerations that are morally irrelevant to the justice or injustice of principles meant to allocate the benefits of social cooperation. |
||
For example, in the imaginary society, one might or might not be intelligent, rich, or born into a preferred class. Since one may occupy any position in the society once the veil is lifted, the device forces the parties to consider society from the perspective of the worst |
For example, in the imaginary society, one might or might not be intelligent, rich, or born into a preferred class. Since one may occupy any position in the society once the veil is lifted, the device forces the parties to consider society from the perspective of the worst-off members. |
||
The veil of ignorance is part of the long tradition of thinking in terms of a [[social contract]]. The writings of [[Immanuel Kant]], [[Thomas Hobbes]], [[John Locke]], [[Jean Jacques Rousseau]], and [[Thomas Jefferson]] offer examples of this tradition. |
The veil of ignorance is part of the long tradition of thinking in terms of a [[social contract]]. The writings of [[Immanuel Kant]], [[Thomas Hobbes]], [[John Locke]], [[Jean Jacques Rousseau]], and [[Thomas Jefferson]] offer examples of this tradition. |
||
Revision as of 12:41, 28 May 2012
The veil of ignorance and the original position are concepts introduced by John Harsanyi[1][2] and later appropriated by John Rawls in A Theory of Justice.[3][4] It is a method of determining the morality of a certain issue (e.g. slavery) based upon the following thought experiment: parties to the original position know nothing about their particular abilities, tastes, and position within the social order of society. The veil of ignorance blocks off this knowledge, such that one does not know what burdens and benefits of social cooperation might fall to him/her once the veil is lifted. With this knowledge blocked, parties to the original position must decide on principles for the distribution of rights, positions and resources in their society. As Rawls put it, "...no one knows his place in society, his class position or social status; nor does he know his fortune in the distribution of natural assets and abilities, his intelligence and strength, and the like."[5] The idea then, is to render moot those personal considerations that are morally irrelevant to the justice or injustice of principles meant to allocate the benefits of social cooperation.
For example, in the imaginary society, one might or might not be intelligent, rich, or born into a preferred class. Since one may occupy any position in the society once the veil is lifted, the device forces the parties to consider society from the perspective of the worst-off members.
The veil of ignorance is part of the long tradition of thinking in terms of a social contract. The writings of Immanuel Kant, Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, Jean Jacques Rousseau, and Thomas Jefferson offer examples of this tradition.
Science fiction writer David Barr Kirtley examined this concept in his short story, "Veil of Ignorance".
See also
External links
- Veil of Ignorance entry by Samuel Freeman in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2008-20-12
- Legal Theory Lexicon: The Veil of Ignorance entry by Lawrence B. Solum in the Legal Theory Blog, 2011-11-14
References
- ^ J.C. Harsanyi, Cardinal utility in welfare economics and in the theory of risk-taking, J. Polit. Economy 61 (1953), pp. 434–435.
- ^ J.C. Harsanyi, Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparison of utility, J. Polit. Economy 63 (1955), pp. 309–321.
- ^ John Rawls, A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press, 1971. ISBN 0-674-00078-1
- ^ John Rawls, Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press, 2001.
- ^ Rawls, John (1999). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press. p. 118. ISBN 0-674-00078-1.