Jump to content

User talk:Elton Bunny: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎COI tag: copyedit
m letters
Line 1: Line 1:
*I have been editing Wikipedia for quite a few years. My first edit from this account was on 10 June 2010, but I started editing anonymously, and made an account only when I found my local library was blocked from editing. I have used this account only when I have been editing from the library, which explains why the account is used only occasionally. [[User:Elton Bunny|Elton Bunny]] ([[User talk:Elton Bunny#top|talk]]) 16:31, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
*I have been editing Wikipedia for quite a few years. My first edit from this account was on 10 June 2010, but I started editing anonymously, and made an account only when I found my local library was blocked from editing. I have used this account only when I have been editing from the library, which explains why the account is used only occasionally. [[User:Elton Bunny|Elton Bunny]] ([[User talk:Elton Bunny#top|talk]]) 16:31, 26 April 2012 (UTC) bn


== Welcome! ==
== Welcome! ==

Revision as of 13:53, 7 June 2012

  • I have been editing Wikipedia for quite a few years. My first edit from this account was on 10 June 2010, but I started editing anonymously, and made an account only when I found my local library was blocked from editing. I have used this account only when I have been editing from the library, which explains why the account is used only occasionally. Elton Bunny (talk) 16:31, 26 April 2012 (UTC) bn[reply]

Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Elton Bunny! I am Claritas and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. Thank you for your contributions. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Claritas § 12:03, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal

The user has been reported as a vandal, and has since been blocked by an administrator. Regards. Claritas § 12:08, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cecil Cooney Deletion

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cecil Cooney This was relisted for "a more thorough discussion" I responded to your negative statement, and have tried to make other points but you have not replied. Is this really a discussion. Is this as good as it gets at Wikipedia.--Jacky Smythe (talk) 04:16, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I hadn't responded because I hadn't been on Wikipedia, and hadn't seen your comments. Wikipedia editing is not a full-time occupation. You may like to read WP:CIVIL. Elton Bunny (talk) 15:52, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Solex Medical Academy deletion

Wikipedia:Articles for speedy deletion/SOLEX_Medical_Academy the page was created with information about a massage school. if you can point out what is 'salesy', i can change it. but the links verify its credibility in the community and its educational existence. i also commented on the article talk pageJdisand1 (talk) 18:03, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Elliot Minor

I have removed the proposed deletion tag you placed on Elliot Minor, as it was discussed at AfD in 2007 and per policy is permanently ineligible for deletion via prod. Compliance with policy is the only reason I did this; it should not be interpreted as my endorsement for keeping the article. If you wish to pursue deletion, please open another AfD by following the 3 steps at WP:AFDHOWTO. I recommend going over WP:BEFORE before doing so. —KuyaBriBriTalk 16:25, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

proposed deletion of C. B. Sobhan

Actually, that page is a copy of his web page at IIT, http://www.nitc.ac.in/index.php/?url=users/view/57/12/3., which is never permitted at Wikipedia , and should have been tagged accordingly, we a "db-copyvio" tag. When patrolling new articles, it is equally important to mark for deletion articles that meet our major reasons for immediate deletion, as to avoid tagging those that do not. OPlease read [[WP:Deletion policy[[, WP:CSD, and WP:BEFORE , prior to resuming patrolling.

As a guide, for articles such as this, was there is a bio written is formal style about someone, there's a firsly good chance it might come from the person's web page, and it's worth checking. DGG ( talk ) 22:46, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've rewritten the above article since you !voted speedy delete at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Began Phali on the basis of a copyright violation. Could you please reassess the article on that basis? Thanks Catfish Jim and the soapdish 12:48, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: A Day for a Miracle

Hello Elton Bunny. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of A Day for a Miracle, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article has been edited since it was tagged and is no longer a copyvio. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 16:35, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Elton Bunny. You have new messages at Bersih2012's talk page.
Message added 13:21, 27 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

AndieM (Am I behaving?) 13:21, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

COI tag

Apparently I am not the only one who thinks the tag is unnecessary. Your tag has been removed by another admin; I do not see why you'd like to keep the COI tag because the article appears to be in a reasonably good shape. If you have some specific complaints, start a discussion on the article's talk page so your concerns can be addressed. Otherwise re-adding the tag would probably be considered just disruptive. --BorgQueen (talk) 12:57, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]