Talk:Riplock: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
←Created page with 'SMART-X is NOT the same as Riplock! I have two Lite-On drives with SMART-X (one DVD and one Blu-Ray) and they rip very fast (the last DVD I ripped, did so at > 1...' |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
SMART-X is NOT the same as Riplock! I have two Lite-On drives with SMART-X (one DVD and one Blu-Ray) and they rip very fast (the last DVD I ripped, did so at > 10x). |
SMART-X is NOT the same as Riplock! I have two Lite-On drives with SMART-X (one DVD and one Blu-Ray) and they rip very fast (the last DVD I ripped, did so at > 10x). |
||
Just tested ripping on two drives with SMART-X, and an older drive. The rates were 12.1x, 12.6x, and 6.3x, respectively. SMART-X is not Riplock. |
|||
Revision as of 00:40, 18 July 2012
SMART-X is NOT the same as Riplock! I have two Lite-On drives with SMART-X (one DVD and one Blu-Ray) and they rip very fast (the last DVD I ripped, did so at > 10x).
Just tested ripping on two drives with SMART-X, and an older drive. The rates were 12.1x, 12.6x, and 6.3x, respectively. SMART-X is not Riplock.