Talk:Ideation (creative process): Difference between revisions
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
On page 13 of the EEA technicl report Global governance-the rise of non-state actors, there is a section on Ideational change.[[Special:Contributions/213.7.161.118|213.7.161.118]] ([[User talk:213.7.161.118|talk]]) 13:10, 16 October 2011 (UTC) |
On page 13 of the EEA technicl report Global governance-the rise of non-state actors, there is a section on Ideational change.[[Special:Contributions/213.7.161.118|213.7.161.118]] ([[User talk:213.7.161.118|talk]]) 13:10, 16 October 2011 (UTC) |
||
When you say "Cynergy" are you talking about the energy of Cygnet's? Or do you mean "synergy"? |
|||
== Shouldn't a long list of "methods of innovation" be in [[innovation]] instead of here? == |
== Shouldn't a long list of "methods of innovation" be in [[innovation]] instead of here? == |
||
Revision as of 08:06, 23 July 2012
i am not an expert but this is a term used also in suicide prevention
the article is in first person....?
Ideational disturbance
Can somebody please define ideational disturbance for me?
Which professions actually use this phrase, or has it fallen into disuse lately?
When, exactly, was this term first used?
Is it a neologism, presumably coined in the 1980s or 1990s?
Notable?
Is this topic even notable enough for it's own article? --Ronz 16:43, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
- No. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.161.236.104 (talk) 01:27, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
Moved from article
"There exist category of specialised consulting companies working inside a field of creativity or concept development. These companies use various ideation techniques."
It's unsourced, promotional in nature, and doesn't fit with the current content. --Ronz 16:05, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
Actually, the creative consultants are a vital part of the current ideation process, because they are often hired to fill ideation needs. This is due to the fact that a limited amount of literature exists on ideation practices which makes companies. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.229.35.3 (talk) 23:06, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
ideation
IDEATION - an absolutely awful American English description for a creative thought process. WHY? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.172.231.162 (talk) 12:44, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Says who? I think it is pretty smart! Besides opinions on words do not negate their acceptance into modern English. I disliked the word Cynergy, but it is now part of modern English. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.229.35.3 (talk) 23:11, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
Ideational change
On page 13 of the EEA technicl report Global governance-the rise of non-state actors, there is a section on Ideational change.213.7.161.118 (talk) 13:10, 16 October 2011 (UTC) When you say "Cynergy" are you talking about the energy of Cygnet's? Or do you mean "synergy"?
Shouldn't a long list of "methods of innovation" be in innovation instead of here?
What do you think? -- 92.226.0.237 (talk) 23:26, 19 July 2012 (UTC)