Talk:Ground zero: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
I agree that this page could use some disambiguation. The definition of the term (its first use at the Trinity site) should remain central, I think. There are currently 10 other uses, not counting external links. There are two uses that clearly should be separated out: its use for Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and its use for the September 11th, 2001 attacks. The page should be disambiguated accordingly. Any thoughts on this? |
I agree that this page could use some disambiguation. The definition of the term (its first use at the Trinity site) should remain central, I think. There are currently 10 other uses, not counting external links. There are two uses that clearly should be separated out: its use for Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and its use for the September 11th, 2001 attacks. The page should be disambiguated accordingly. Any thoughts on this? |
||
== merge proposal == |
|||
I don't think [[The Pile]] needs to be a full article itself. Should either be merged (back?) here or into [[World Trade Center site]]. --[[User:Grocer|Grocer]] 01:12, 29 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 01:12, 29 April 2006
Now that there's an article for The Pile, could most of the WTC stuff be moved there? -- Tarquin
Japanese spelling is "グラウンド·ゼロ".But,the link "ja:グラウンド·ゼロ" is not jump to "グラウンド·ゼロ" . Modeha 05:53, 15 Jan 2004 (UTC)
- I've tried, But it seems to me that it have no problems. Please check. Wandering perfect fool 10:22, 3 Feb 2004 (UTC)
disambiguation
I agree that this page could use some disambiguation. The definition of the term (its first use at the Trinity site) should remain central, I think. There are currently 10 other uses, not counting external links. There are two uses that clearly should be separated out: its use for Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and its use for the September 11th, 2001 attacks. The page should be disambiguated accordingly. Any thoughts on this?
merge proposal
I don't think The Pile needs to be a full article itself. Should either be merged (back?) here or into World Trade Center site. --Grocer 01:12, 29 April 2006 (UTC)