Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Kalmar Castle: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*'''Oppose'''. Interesting shot. But, as above, it does not illustrate the castle particularly well. [[User:Bcasterline|bcasterline]] [[User_talk:Bcasterline|t]] 19:04, 5 May 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Oppose'''. Interesting shot. But, as above, it does not illustrate the castle particularly well. [[User:Bcasterline|bcasterline]] [[User_talk:Bcasterline|t]] 19:04, 5 May 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Oppose''' Artistic, but not encyclopedic. ~[[User:Mdd4696 |MDD]][[User talk:Mdd4696 |46]][[Special:Contributions/Mdd4696 |96]] 21:31, 5 May 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Oppose''' Artistic, but not encyclopedic. ~[[User:Mdd4696 |MDD]][[User talk:Mdd4696 |46]][[Special:Contributions/Mdd4696 |96]] 21:31, 5 May 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Oppose''', It's not very upclose and whats with the tree? |
*'''Oppose''', It's not very upclose and whats with the tree? -- [[User:BWF89|BWF89]] 02:07, 6 May 2006 (UTC) |
||
<!-- additional votes go above this line --> |
<!-- additional votes go above this line --> |
||
{{-}} |
{{-}} |
||
Revision as of 02:07, 6 May 2006
Kalmar Castle
- Nominate and support. - I feel this is a beautiful picture of Kalmar Castle, Sweden, in early August sunshine taken in 2005. The colours in the picture are bright and pleasing to the eye and the tree in the foreground frames the picture well. Also has quite high definition picture quality. It appears in the English Wikipedia page for Kalmar. Electricmoose- Electrifying talk 17:54, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
- Neutral The tree really dominates the image; kalmar is relegated to a small part of the frame, leaving no detail in the thumbnail. It's a pretty picture, but it could be better illustrative of the castle if it took up more of the frame. Also, the castle itself is blurry, tilted, and obscured by a branch. Night Gyr 18:22, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
- Update Thanks for comments, I have cropped and straightened original picture, I could also straighten the original too if anyone felt it necessary as well. Thanks again. Electricmoose- Electrifying talk 18:40, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose The tree in the foreground does not frame the picture very well. It is just a distracting, unneeded object - especially for an illustration in an encyclopedia. Mikeo 19:00, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Interesting shot. But, as above, it does not illustrate the castle particularly well. bcasterline t 19:04, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Artistic, but not encyclopedic. ~MDD4696 21:31, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose, It's not very upclose and whats with the tree? -- BWF89 02:07, 6 May 2006 (UTC)