Wikipedia:Training/For students/Training feedback: Difference between revisions
→~~~I didnt lfeel like it helped me: new section |
→~~~: new section |
||
Line 647: | Line 647: | ||
--[[User:Morgan99a|Morgan99a]] ([[User talk:Morgan99a|talk]]) 01:35, 16 October 2012 (UTC) |
--[[User:Morgan99a|Morgan99a]] ([[User talk:Morgan99a|talk]]) 01:35, 16 October 2012 (UTC) |
||
== [[User:Morgan99a|Morgan99a]] ([[User talk:Morgan99a|talk]]) == |
|||
;What I liked:It somewhat explained where to go for help |
|||
... |
|||
;What I didn't like:I do not think i gained anything useful in helping me edit my work. |
|||
... |
|||
;What was missing:More information on editing |
|||
... |
|||
;What was unnecessary:the quotes qt the beginning of each new section. |
|||
... |
|||
--[[User:Morgan99a|Morgan99a]] ([[User talk:Morgan99a|talk]]) 01:37, 16 October 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:37, 16 October 2012
You can leave a message here to let us know what you thought of the training.
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Kjholt01 (talk) 18:11, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
--Mwtwgt (talk) 16:10, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
- What I liked
...The videos were very easy to understand.
- What I didn't like
...The number of slides was a bit much.
- What was missing
...Nothing
- What was unnecessary
...The slides with just pictures or quotes were not necessary.
--Krankoskiek14 (talk) 22:31, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
- What I liked
... I liked that it was really easy to understand and not as involved as I thought it would be.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--ZwartC (talk) 01:16, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
- What I liked
...The videos were interesting and good descriptions of how to use wikipedia.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Allena3 (talk) 04:40, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
- What I liked
...videos
- What I didn't like
...having to download a new plug in for the videos
- What was missing
...nothing i can think of
- What was unnecessary
...nothing
--Sflevine91 (talk) 21:26, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--132.162.92.72 (talk) 17:54, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--173.240.229.83 (talk) 20:54, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
- What I liked
very helpful, brief ...
- What I didn't like
learning how to navigate this stuff ...
- What was missing
nothing ...
- What was unnecessary
nothing ...
--Raleigh1984 (talk) 00:22, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--CareMart (talk) 18:29, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
- What I liked
...a clear outline of the content
- What I didn't like
... the video format
- What was missing
... PDFs that we could download as a reference
- What was unnecessary
... n/a
--LKMlynarski (talk) 18:55, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
overall, very helpful!
- What I liked
It was very thorough and went over most of the questions I had about how to resolve potential disputes with other Wikipedia editors.
- What I didn't like
Some of the points covered seemed a little unnecessary.
- What was missing
Nothing really, I thought the orientation was rather thorough.
- What was unnecessary
There was a lot of time devoted to plagiarism which was rather heavy handed. I think that if someone is going to be editing this on a more serious level, they do not need as much babying when it comes to this subject.
--Acat2169 (talk) 20:33, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
- What I liked
...I liked how interactive it was.
- What I didn't like
...I didn't like the emphasis on etiquette. Seemed kind of self evident.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...That youtube video.
--Ilona.bass (talk) 02:35, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
- What I liked
...It helped me gain a better understanding of the process of editing and creating articles. I liked how the training explained the wikipedia community and all that goes into the editing process which I was unaware of.
- What I didn't like
... The videos would not open on my computer.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Mkvallinger (talk) 15:01, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
- What I liked
... I liked the succinct nature of the module, and the practical screencasts.
- What I didn't like
... At times, there were too many pages to click through, with not enough information on each page.
- What was missing
...
I think it covered everything.
- What was unnecessary
... It was good, just spread out too much between pages. --Nrector (talk) 16:44, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
- What I liked
... The use of videos was very helpful to my understanding of the ideas.
- What I didn't like
... More paragraphs?
- What was missing
... Nothing yet...
- What was unnecessary
... It was good! --Akozol (talk) 16:53, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
- What I liked
...Very thorough
- What I didn't like
...Too long
- What was missing
...Nothing
- What was unnecessary
...The "Great Feeling" video
--Jersey 1102 (talk) 19:57, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
- What I liked
...basic outline
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...n/a
- What was unnecessary
...n/a
--DrFTS (talk) 19:20, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Mturnbul (talk) 14:45, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
- What I liked
...I liked the help learning how to make things bold and all the other editing help
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...I did not learn how to make bullets or numbering
- What was unnecessary
...
--Jfrey93 (talk) 00:08, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
- What I liked
...Understanding the back story and community of wikipedia
- What I didn't like
...reading all the pages
- What was missing
...nothing that i'm aware of
- What was unnecessary
... the video of why wikipedians are weird
--Ddzam (talk) 23:35, 7 October 2012 (UTC)ddzam
- What I liked
I really loved the videos ...
- What I didn't like
The goofy pictures ...
- What was missing
Nothing ...
- What was unnecessary
The quotes ...
--129.252.175.63 (talk) 15:48, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
Italic text;What I liked: ...It was very informative and helped to teach me the basics of how to use Wikipedia
- What I didn't like
...I believe that some of the videos just giving a backround for wikipedia was unnecessary
- What was missing
...I dont think anything was missing
- What was unnecessary
...Some of the videos were. --Rahn34 (talk) 00:58, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Simmonbr (talk) 01:16, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
- What I liked
...I liked the detail of the orientation and the opportunity to follow along while creating my own article.
- What I didn't like
...There wasn't anything I can think of that I didn't like.
- What was missing
...Nothing to my knowledge.
- What was unnecessary
...I think all components were necessary. Everything was clear and concise.
--SongBird 91 (talk) 03:11, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
- What I liked
- I liked that the info was very in depth, and clear on what the developers want.
...
- What I didn't like
- It is a lot of information up front. I think that the tutorial should instead take you through the creation of your first page.
...
- What was missing
- I think that the tutorial should take you through the process of making a "starter" page.
...
- What was unnecessary
- In my opinion it got a little long without having hands on content.
...
--Smith.DustinT (talk) 16:49, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
- What I liked
I thought that the orientation was very easy to follow.
- What I didn't like
I feel like the module with thirty pages got a little tedious.
- What was missing
I did not really feel like anything was missing, I think alot of what was not on there is going to be learned on the job, as in how you will likely deal with criticism. (obviously you are not going to lash out at people, but how you chose to rework what you have)
- What was unnecessary
I felt like most everything was needed in some form or another, mostly because it is a public place and each person deserves to have their voice hear. As such we need to all be respectful of one another, and all follow the same guidelines.
--Tubatoothpaste 13 (talk) 16:58, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
- What I liked
I liked how informative it was. Went into great detail to make some areas of the cite clearer. ...
- What I didn't like
I personallly liked all the information. I found no fault in it. ...
- What was missing
Nothing that I could see. ...
- What was unnecessary
All of it was necessary for someone who has never had an account and used it here. ...
--Saphiekitty (talk) 20:08, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
- What I liked
I liked that videos were used to further show how things are done. ...
- What I didn't like
There wasn't anything I didnt really like. ...
- What was missing
All of it was good. ...
- What was unnecessary
Nothing was unnecessary. ...
--IsaraRina (talk) 20:08, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
- What I liked
...I liked how detailed it was and how it was organized into 4 categories.
- What I didn't like
... I liked all of it. It was helpful.
- What was missing
...Nothing was missing.
- What was unnecessary
... I didn't think anything was unnecessary.
--Josh Schultz23 (talk) 20:30, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
- What I liked
- It helped show me how to use wiki the proper way and little hints and tips that will help.
...
- What I didn't like
- Some of it was pretty obvious and i already knew it
...
- What was missing
- nothing
...
- What was unnecessary
- nothing
...
--Garrettsteer (talk) 20:39, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
- What I liked
I liked that it taught me how to edit the wiki and that I actually have and idea on how to edit.
- What I didn't like
it took to dang long and there werent a bunch of pictures.
- What was missing
pictures
- What was unnecessary
To long of explanations --Karissa fox (talk) 20:40, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Llogger63 (talk) 20:41, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
- What I liked
- That it was very informative and provided the basics which I didn't understand before.
...
- What I didn't like
- The videos didn't work for me.
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--R niemeyer (talk) 20:42, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
- What I liked
... I liked that it tells us what we need to do in order to submit our research papers.
- What I didn't like
... How long it took to read the entire thing.
- What was missing
...nothings was really missing, the videos wouldn't play in our computer labs
- What was unnecessary
... The number of pages that had all the information
--Lil linz (talk) 20:42, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
- What I liked
it was helpful
- What I didn't like
it was kind of boring
- What was missing
i dont know
- What was unnecessary
the quotes from people
--JessieLauren (talk) 20:44, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--TatumR12 (talk) 20:46, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Armywife102393 (talk) 20:47, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
- What I liked
... The orientation was informative
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Courtney Fortner (talk) 21:06, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
--Morgan99a (talk) 01:35, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
- What I liked
- It somewhat explained where to go for help
...
- What I didn't like
- I do not think i gained anything useful in helping me edit my work.
...
- What was missing
- More information on editing
...
- What was unnecessary
- the quotes qt the beginning of each new section.
...