Jump to content

College Network, Inc. v. Moore Educational Publishers, Inc.: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Kaffyne (talk | contribs)
+Infobox opinion
Kaffyne (talk | contribs)
intro blurb added (intermediary save, need to change devices)
Line 24: Line 24:
|italic title = yes
|italic title = yes
}}
}}

[blurb inserted here]
'''''College Network, Inc. v. Moore Educational Publishers, Inc.''''', [[Case citation|No. 09-50596]] (5th Cir. 2010) was an appellate level case that analyzed _______.

The original suit was brought on a claim of [trademark infringement] in the purchase of certain advertising keywords that the defendant countered with claims of [defamation] and [tortious interference]. However, the main issue addressed in the appeal was the counterclaims of the defendant.


==Background==
==Background==


'''''College Network, Inc. v. Moore Educational Publishers, Inc.''''', [[Case Citation|No. 09-50596]] (5th Cir. 2010) was a
==Court Analysis==
==Court Analysis==
==Ruling==
==Ruling==

Revision as of 06:32, 18 October 2012

College Network, Inc. v. Moore Educational Publishers, Inc.

College Network, Inc. v. Moore Educational Publishers, Inc.
CourtUnited States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMay 12, 2010
Citation(s)No. 09-50596
Case history
Appealed fromUnited States District Court for the Western District of Texas
Court membership
Judges sittingCarolyn Dineen King, Jacques L. Wiener, Jr., James L. Dennis
Case opinions
Court vacated the tortious interference awarded to Moore Educational, but otherwise affirmed the district court ruling.
Decision byPer curiam
Keywords
FILLMEIN

College Network, Inc. v. Moore Educational Publishers, Inc., No. 09-50596 (5th Cir. 2010) was an appellate level case that analyzed _______.

The original suit was brought on a claim of [trademark infringement] in the purchase of certain advertising keywords that the defendant countered with claims of [defamation] and [tortious interference]. However, the main issue addressed in the appeal was the counterclaims of the defendant.

Background

Court Analysis

Ruling

See Also

External links

(put after ref)

References

Court opinion

Blog

Law firm articles (good for lay readers...some at least)

Articles

Honorable mentions