Jump to content

Talk:Footedness: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 58: Line 58:


The final section that contains instructions on how to predict a person's footedness urgently requires citations, as the content is instructional and might be undertaken by a reader.--[[User:Soulparadox|Soulparadox]] ([[User talk:Soulparadox|talk]]) 14:04, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
The final section that contains instructions on how to predict a person's footedness urgently requires citations, as the content is instructional and might be undertaken by a reader.--[[User:Soulparadox|Soulparadox]] ([[User talk:Soulparadox|talk]]) 14:04, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

== Origins and Myths section ==

From the article:
"Unlike handedness, it's likely that the distribution of participants in boardsports is evenly split between regular and goofy riders."

I couldn't say for sure this is incorrect in the context of boardsports, but I'm surprised by this affirmation, because in soccer, right-footedness is highly more common among players. [[User:ThorinMuglindir|ThorinMuglindir]] ([[User talk:ThorinMuglindir|talk]]) 23:26, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:26, 21 October 2012

old and untitled

Actually, Bam Margera is goofy-footed.


Saying "when a rider rides in other than his preferred stance, he is said to ride switch stance or fakie." is incorrect. Fakie means riding backwards in one's preferred stance.

^^^ How is that statement incorrect? If I'm riding left foot forward and run out of speed before I get to the top of a hill on my board and decide not to turn around but instead start rolling backwards back down the hill..... or fakie........ my right foot is then forward as if I'm riding Goofy-footed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.1.84.57 (talk) 13:51, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article could use a more general, less boardsport-specific examination of footedness. Footedness seems to be manifested in all kinds of situations where the body has to be placed sideways relative to some directional activity, for example in trackstands in cycling. I bet someone somewhere has written something interesting about this but I'm too lazy to look for it myself. Adrianmander 20:33, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]


The sentences on BMX (under "other") don't make any sense. I don't know anything about BMX so I can't fix it. Oneirist 21:05, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Parts of this article are written in terms of both sex and then proceed to state one, such as "balance herself". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.111.162.127 (talk) 18:56, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A snowboard instructor told me that the term "goofy footed" predates snowboarding and skate boarding. Those two sports borrowed the slang from surfing. The surfers started the term because there was an early Disney cartoon in which the character Goofy was riding some kind of board shaped thing, and he had his right foot forward. Can someone please verify this? Does anybody know what cartoon that might have been? Ak outrider (talk) 23:06, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's correct that Goofy rides with his right foot forward in Hawaiian Holiday (at 7:50).--Frumpo (talk) 16:05, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Correlation with handedness

Is there much correlation as to footedness, with which hand the rider prefers to write, use tools, etc? knoodelhed (talk) 20:18, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Because it is more common to be right handed than left handed and it is more common to ride regular than goofy there has to be some overlap of regular footed right handed people. I dont know for sure. As a piece of information I am right handed and ride goofy a friend of mine is left handed and rides regular. Two people though however, is hardly a statiscally significant number.Crd721 (talk) 06:51, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Correction: that friend of mine that rides regular is right handed. Crd721 (talk) 08:18, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ratio

Does anyone know the goofy/regular ratio?Crd721 (talk) 06:56, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Biased introduction?

"Skateboarders DO NOT use this term and most have not heard of it. This is an obscure term." To me that sounds like something an angry skateboarder has written, and is his opinion, and not very encyclopaedic. It's not an obscure term, most people where I live will have heard of it, if only in relation to football. Whether or not skateboarders say it is another matter, but could be phrased better. --Lytel (talk) 21:56, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I thought so too, so I changed it to the slightly more neutral-sounding [though still unsourced...] 'Many skateboarders do not use this term and most have not heard of it. This is considered an obscure term' for the time being as a stopgap. 78.149.214.76 (talk) 13:23, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just went ahead and removed it because it's completely POV and unsourced. - superβεεcat  21:19, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some Confusion

Pushing someone from behind will not necessarily lead them to put the same foot forward as they would put forward on a board. It's not a matter of which foot is in front or behind, it's a matter of which one holds weight and which one moves. I ride (when I ride) with left foot in front, and push with my right foot. If you push me from behind, I'll put my right foot forward. I balance far better on my left foot, and do things, such as kick or swing or push, more comfortably with the right. It's not just a question of one foot being "stronger" or "in front". --Badmuthahubbard (talk) 12:47, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

why

Why is the general article on footedness about skateboarding and wakeboarding? For comparison, the page on handedness is written from a general scientific perspective, discussing implications of handedness on a variety of activities. Footedness is a general characteristic of human anatomy and not limited to the scope of the sports around which this article is focused. It needs to be completely rewritten to discuss footedness in a scientific, anatomical fashion; the current content could certainly be used as an example of the implications of footedness in one specific arena.


—Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.101.227.97 (talk) 22:33, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Biased Introduction?

Being 33 years old and having been able to skateboard since the age of 10 I can conform that "goofy foot" is indeed a real term within the board sports community. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.7.92.34 (talk) 02:59, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Overhaul

I've overhauled this article a few times over the last few days, with the most recent work attempting to generalize the notion of footedness, moving all boardsport content to a top-level section. Having skated and followed skateboarding since the mid 80s, I had to rely mostly on that knowledge, but I think it turned out clearer and more encyclopedic, even if it's still missing a lot of references. I've also done work on the Ollie, Kickflip, and List of skateboarding terms articles. Listendaisy (talk) 08:26, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Predicting section

The final section that contains instructions on how to predict a person's footedness urgently requires citations, as the content is instructional and might be undertaken by a reader.--Soulparadox (talk) 14:04, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Origins and Myths section

From the article: "Unlike handedness, it's likely that the distribution of participants in boardsports is evenly split between regular and goofy riders."

I couldn't say for sure this is incorrect in the context of boardsports, but I'm surprised by this affirmation, because in soccer, right-footedness is highly more common among players. ThorinMuglindir (talk) 23:26, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]