Jump to content

Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Qworty (talk | contribs)
Undid revision 505463033 by Nomdeplume6000 (talk) undo promotional edit
Line 55: Line 55:
[[MSNBC]] stated that the article “reads alternately like a how-to guide, a satire or a lament.”<ref>{{cite web|last=Mong |first=Adrienne |url=http://behindthewall.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/01/10/5805977-chinese-or-western-who-wins-the-mommy-war- |title=Behind The Wall - Chinese or Western? Who wins the mommy war? |publisher=Behindthewall.msnbc.msn.com |date= |accessdate=January 28, 2011}}</ref> MSNBC’s critical response goes on to state that “the article sounds so incredible to Western readers – and many Asian ones, too – that many people thought the whole thing was satire... [but] aspects of her essay resonated profoundly with many people, especially Chinese Americans – not necessarily in a good way.” In the [[Financial Times]], Isabel Berwick called the “tiger mother” approach to parenting “the exact opposite of everything that the Western liberal holds dear.”<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/2ebc6d28-1f56-11e0-8c1c-00144feab49a.html#ixzz1C0a7foqy |title=Review: Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother | first = Isabel |last = Berwick |publisher=The Financial Times, Ltd. |journal = Financial Times |date=January 17, 2011 |accessdate=January 28, 2011| archiveurl= http://web.archive.org/web/20110120080237/http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/2ebc6d28-1f56-11e0-8c1c-00144feab49a.html| archivedate= 20 January 2011 <!--DASHBot-->| deadurl= no}}</ref>
[[MSNBC]] stated that the article “reads alternately like a how-to guide, a satire or a lament.”<ref>{{cite web|last=Mong |first=Adrienne |url=http://behindthewall.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/01/10/5805977-chinese-or-western-who-wins-the-mommy-war- |title=Behind The Wall - Chinese or Western? Who wins the mommy war? |publisher=Behindthewall.msnbc.msn.com |date= |accessdate=January 28, 2011}}</ref> MSNBC’s critical response goes on to state that “the article sounds so incredible to Western readers – and many Asian ones, too – that many people thought the whole thing was satire... [but] aspects of her essay resonated profoundly with many people, especially Chinese Americans – not necessarily in a good way.” In the [[Financial Times]], Isabel Berwick called the “tiger mother” approach to parenting “the exact opposite of everything that the Western liberal holds dear.”<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/2ebc6d28-1f56-11e0-8c1c-00144feab49a.html#ixzz1C0a7foqy |title=Review: Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother | first = Isabel |last = Berwick |publisher=The Financial Times, Ltd. |journal = Financial Times |date=January 17, 2011 |accessdate=January 28, 2011| archiveurl= http://web.archive.org/web/20110120080237/http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/2ebc6d28-1f56-11e0-8c1c-00144feab49a.html| archivedate= 20 January 2011 <!--DASHBot-->| deadurl= no}}</ref>


[[David Brooks (journalist)|David Brooks]] of the [[New York Times]], in an op-ed piece entitled ‘Amy Chua is a “Wimp”’, wrote that he believed Chua was “coddling her children” because “[m]anaging status rivalries, negotiating group dynamics, understanding social norms, navigating the distinction between self and group — these and other social tests impose cognitive demands that blow away any intense tutoring session or a class at Yale.”<ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/18/opinion/18brooks.html | work=The New York Times | first=David | last=Brooks | title=Amy Chua Is a Wimp | date=January 17, 2011}}</ref> ''[[The Washington Post]]'', while not as critical, did suggest that “ending a parenting story when one child is only 15 seems premature.”<ref>{{cite news|author=Post Store |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/07/AR2011010702516.html |title=Amy Chua's "Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother," on Chinese-American family culture |publisher=Washingtonpost.com |date=January 7, 2011 |accessdate=January 28, 2011}}</ref> In a review for the [[Washington Independent Review of Books]], Heather Banks writes that Chua is "her own worst enemy. Raising two daughters, Sophia and Louisa (called “Lulu”), she seems a cross between Leopold Mozart (the ultimate stage father) and Joan Crawford (“Mommy Dearest”). In interviews, she says the book demonstrates her sense of humor, but there is little evidence of it."<ref>{{cite web|last=Banks|first=Heather|title=''The Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mom'' review|url=http://www.washingtonindependentreviewofbooks.com/bookreview/battle-hymn-of-the-tiger-mother/|work=Book review|publisher=The Washington Independent Review of Books|accessdate=Feb 5, 2011}}</ref>
[[David Brooks (journalist)|David Brooks]] of the [[New York Times]], in an op-ed piece entitled ‘Amy Chua is a “Wimp”’, wrote that he believed Chua was “coddling her children” because “[m]anaging status rivalries, negotiating group dynamics, understanding social norms, navigating the distinction between self and group — these and other social tests impose cognitive demands that blow away any intense tutoring session or a class at Yale.”<ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/18/opinion/18brooks.html | work=The New York Times | first=David | last=Brooks | title=Amy Chua Is a Wimp | date=January 17, 2011}}</ref> ''[[The Washington Post]]'', while not as critical, did suggest that “ending a parenting story when one child is only 15 seems premature.”<ref>{{cite news|author=Post Store |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/07/AR2011010702516.html |title=Amy Chua's "Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother," on Chinese-American family culture |publisher=Washingtonpost.com |date=January 7, 2011 |accessdate=January 28, 2011}}</ref>


Others have noted that the ''Wall Street Journal'' article took excerpts only from the beginning of the book, and not from any of the later chapters in which Chua describes her retreat from what she calls “Chinese” parenting. Author [[Amy Gutman]] felt many have missed the point of Chua’s book, which she described as “[[coming of age]]”, and states the controversial examples shown in the book “reflect where Chua started, not who she is today, and passing judgment on her based on them strikes me as a bit akin to passing judgment on [[Jane Austen]]’s [[Emma]] for her churlish behavior to Miss Bates. Like Emma’s, Chua’s narrative has an arc. It’s a coming-of-age story -- where the one to come of age is the parent.”<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/amy-gutman/tiger-mother-debate_b_810515.html|title=Rousing the Tiger Mother Inside Me|author=[[Amy Gutman]]|publisher=''[[The Huffington Post]]''|date=November 17, 2011}}</ref>
Others have noted that the ''Wall Street Journal'' article took excerpts only from the beginning of the book, and not from any of the later chapters in which Chua describes her retreat from what she calls “Chinese” parenting. Author [[Amy Gutman]] felt many have missed the point of Chua’s book, which she described as “[[coming of age]]”, and states the controversial examples shown in the book “reflect where Chua started, not who she is today, and passing judgment on her based on them strikes me as a bit akin to passing judgment on [[Jane Austen]]’s [[Emma]] for her churlish behavior to Miss Bates. Like Emma’s, Chua’s narrative has an arc. It’s a coming-of-age story -- where the one to come of age is the parent.”<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/amy-gutman/tiger-mother-debate_b_810515.html|title=Rousing the Tiger Mother Inside Me|author=[[Amy Gutman]]|publisher=''[[The Huffington Post]]''|date=November 17, 2011}}</ref>

Revision as of 04:55, 23 October 2012

Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother
AuthorAmy Chua
LanguageEnglish
PublisherPenguin Group
Publication date
2011
Publication placeUnited States
Pages240
ISBN978-1-59420-284-1

Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother is a book by Amy Chua published in 2011.[1][2] The complete subtitle of the book is: “This is a story about a mother, two daughters, and two dogs. This was supposed to be a story of how Chinese parents are better at raising kids than Western ones. But instead, it's about a bitter clash of cultures, a fleeting taste of glory, and how I was humbled by a thirteen-year-old.”[3]

Summary

Wall Street Journal preview

An article published under the headline “Why Chinese Mothers Are Superior” in the Wall Street Journal on January 8, 2011, contained excerpts from her book, in which Chua describes her efforts to give her children what she describes as a traditional, strict “Chinese” upbringing.[4] This piece was controversial. Many readers missed the irony and self-deprecating humor in the title and the piece itself and instead believed that Chua was advocating the “superiority” of a particular, very strict, ethnically defined approach to parenting. In fact Chua has stated that the book was not a "how-to" manual but a self-mocking memoir.[5][6] In any case, Chua defines “Chinese mother” loosely to include parents of other ethnicities who practice traditional, strict child-rearing, while also acknowledging that “Western parents come in all varieties,” and not all ethnically Chinese parents practice strict child-rearing. [3]: 4 

Chua also reported that in one study of 48 Chinese immigrant mothers, the vast majority 'said that they believe their children can be "the best" students, that "academic achievement reflects successful parenting," and that if children did not excel at school then there was "a problem" and parents "were not doing their job."' Chua contrasts them with the view she labels “Western” – that a child’s self-esteem is paramount.[4]

In one extreme example, Chua mentioned that she had called one of her children “garbage,” a translation of a term her own father called her on occasion in her family’s native Hokkien dialect. Particularly controversial was the ‘Little White Donkey’ anecdote, where Chua described how she got her unwilling younger daughter to learn a very difficult piano piece. In Chua’s words, “… I hauled Lulu’s dollhouse to the car and told her I’d donate it to the Salvation Army piece by piece if she didn’t have ‘The Little White Donkey’ perfect by the next day. When Lulu said, ‘I thought you were going to the Salvation Army, why are you still here?’ I threatened her with no lunch, no dinner, no Christmas or Hanukkah presents, no birthday parties for two, three, four years. When she still kept playing it wrong, I told her she was purposely working herself into a frenzy because she was secretly afraid she couldn’t do it. I told her to stop being lazy, cowardly, self-indulgent and pathetic.” They then “work[ed] right through dinner” without letting her daughter “get up, not for water, not even for bathroom breaks.” The anecdote concludes by describing how her daughter was “beaming” after she finally mastered the piece and “wanted to play [it] over and over.”[4][3]: 62 

Chua uses the term "Tiger Mother" to mean a mother who is a strict disciplinarian. This use of the term appears to be fairly recent. In his novel South Wind published in 1917, Norman Douglas uses the phrase to mean a mother who will do anything – including committing murder – to protect her child.[citation needed]

Reception

The Wall Street Journal article[4] generated a huge response, both positive and negative. Charles Murray of the American Enterprise Institute, for instance, argued that “large numbers of talented children everywhere would profit from Chua’s approach, and instead are frittering away their gifts — they’re nice kids, not brats, but they are also self-indulgent and inclined to make excuses for themselves.”[7] In a poll on the Wall Street Journal website regarding Chua’s response to readers, two-thirds of respondents[clarification needed] said the “Demanding Eastern” parenting model is better than the “Permissive Western” model.[8] Allison Pearson wondered the following in The Daily Telegraph: “Amy Chua’s philosophy of child-rearing may be harsh and not for the fainthearted, but ask yourself this: is it really more cruel than the laissez-faire indifference and babysitting-by-TV which too often passes for parenting these days?”[9]

Annie Paul, writing for Time, describes, “[i]n the 2008 book A Nation of Wimps, author Hara Estroff Marano, editor-at-large of Psychology Today magazine, marshals evidence supporting Chua's approach. ‘Research demonstrates that children who are protected from grappling with difficult tasks don’t develop what psychologists call ‘mastery experiences,’’ Marano explains. "Kids who have this well-earned sense of mastery are more optimistic and decisive; they've learned that they're capable of overcoming adversity and achieving goals." [10] Ann Hulbert of Slate remarks on Chua’s “shocking honesty about tactics. She has written the kind of exposé usually staged later by former prodigies themselves. ... [Chua] is a tiger who roars rather than purrs. That's because no child, she points out, naturally clamors for the ‘tenacious practice, practice, practice’ that mastery demands.”[11]

MSNBC stated that the article “reads alternately like a how-to guide, a satire or a lament.”[12] MSNBC’s critical response goes on to state that “the article sounds so incredible to Western readers – and many Asian ones, too – that many people thought the whole thing was satire... [but] aspects of her essay resonated profoundly with many people, especially Chinese Americans – not necessarily in a good way.” In the Financial Times, Isabel Berwick called the “tiger mother” approach to parenting “the exact opposite of everything that the Western liberal holds dear.”[13]

David Brooks of the New York Times, in an op-ed piece entitled ‘Amy Chua is a “Wimp”’, wrote that he believed Chua was “coddling her children” because “[m]anaging status rivalries, negotiating group dynamics, understanding social norms, navigating the distinction between self and group — these and other social tests impose cognitive demands that blow away any intense tutoring session or a class at Yale.”[14] The Washington Post, while not as critical, did suggest that “ending a parenting story when one child is only 15 seems premature.”[15]

Others have noted that the Wall Street Journal article took excerpts only from the beginning of the book, and not from any of the later chapters in which Chua describes her retreat from what she calls “Chinese” parenting. Author Amy Gutman felt many have missed the point of Chua’s book, which she described as “coming of age”, and states the controversial examples shown in the book “reflect where Chua started, not who she is today, and passing judgment on her based on them strikes me as a bit akin to passing judgment on Jane Austen’s Emma for her churlish behavior to Miss Bates. Like Emma’s, Chua’s narrative has an arc. It’s a coming-of-age story -- where the one to come of age is the parent.”[16]

Jon Carroll of the San Francisco Chronicle felt the excerpts in the Wall Street Journal article failed to represent the content in Chua’s book and states that “the excerpt was chosen by the editors of the Journal and the publishers. The editors wanted to make a sensation; the publishers want to sell books” but “it does not tell the whole story.”[17] A spokeswoman for the Wall Street Journal told the Columbia Journalism Review that “[w]e worked extensively with Amy’s publisher, as we always do with book excerpts, and they signed off on the chosen extract in advance.”[18] Chua maintains that “[t]he Journal basically strung together the most controversial sections of the book. And I had no idea they’d put that kind of a title on it.”[18]

On March 29, 2011, the Wall Street Journal organized an event under the title 'The Return of Tiger Mom' in the New York Public Library.[19] This event has discussed different aspects of child-raising, in a more subtle and non-sensational manner, compared to controversy which the book had previously evoked. Amy Chua's husband, Jed Rubenfeld, and their two daughters have also attended the event. Rubenfeld, who has become known as 'Tiger Dad,' has said that he doesn't see the Tiger Mom education method as a representative of Chinese education, but rather a more traditional old-fashioned style.[20] He and Chua expressed a more liberal attitude compared with the Wall Street Journal's article, while still stressing the importance of discipline in a child's early years.

Chua's defense

Chua has openly confronted criticism in print and during her book signings.[21] In a follow-up article in the Wall Street Journal, Chua explains that “my actual book is not a how-to guide; it's a memoir, the story of our family's journey in two cultures, and my own eventual transformation as a mother. Much of the book is about my decision to retreat from the strict ‘Chinese’ approach, after my younger daughter rebelled at 13.”[8]

In an interview with Jezebel, Chua addresses why she believes the book has hit such a chord with parents: “We parents, including me, are all so anxious about whether we're doing the right thing. You can never know the results. It's this latent anxiety.”[22] In a conversation with Die Zeit, Chua says about her book: "I would never burn the stuffed animals of my children—that was a hyperbole, an exaggeration. I have intensified many situations to clarify my position." She adds that the book "was therapy for me at the time of a great defeat." [23][24]

Reaction by Chua’s daughter Sophia

On January 17, 2011, an open letter from Chua’s older daughter, Sophia Chua-Rubenfeld, to her mother was published in the New York Post.[25] Sophia’s letter defends her parents’ child-rearing methods and states that she and her sister were not oppressed by an “evil mother.” She discusses some of the incidents that have been criticized as unduly harsh, and explains that they were not as bad as they sound out of context. She ends the letter saying, “If I died tomorrow, I would die feeling I’ve lived my whole life at 110 percent. And for that, Tiger Mom, thank you.”[25]

Cultural references

The term and behaviour of the "Tiger Mother" has been satirized in the online anthropomorphic animal comic strip series Kevin and Kell [26] with the recurring characters Mei-Li Lee and her raising methods with her daughter Lin as well as in attitude[27], although it's been noted that Mei-Li is not actually a tiger but a tabby cat passing for one [28].

See also

References

  1. ^ Terry Hong, Special to The Chronicle (January 9, 2011). "San Francisco Chronicle review of Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother". Sfgate.com. Archived from the original on 21 January 2011. Retrieved January 28, 2011. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  2. ^ Post Store (January 7, 2011). "''Washington Post'' review of ''Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother''". Washingtonpost.com. Retrieved January 28, 2011.
  3. ^ a b c Chua, Amy (January 11, 2011). "Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother". Penguin Press Hard Cover. ISBN 978-1-59420-284-1. Retrieved January 15, 2012.
  4. ^ a b c d Chua, Amy (January 8, 2011). "Why Chinese Mothers Are Superior". Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on February 13, 2011.
  5. ^ Zernike, Kate (January 14, 2011). "Retreat of the 'Tiger Mother'". The New York Times. Retrieved December, 25 2011. ... ironic and self-mocking ... Here's what I did, and boy did I learn a lesson. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  6. ^ Chua, Amy (December 24, 2011). "Tiger Mom's Long-Distance Cub". The Wall Street Journal.
  7. ^ Murray, Charles (January 12, 2011). "Amy Chua Bludgeons Entire Generation of Sensitive Parents, Bless Her " The Enterprise Blog". Blog.american.com. Retrieved January 28, 2011.
  8. ^ a b "The Tiger Mother Responds to Readers". Wall Street Journal. January 13, 2011.
  9. ^ Pearson, Allison (January 13, 2011). "Why we all need a Tiger Mother". London: Telegraph. Archived from the original on 20 January 2011. Retrieved January 28, 2011. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  10. ^ Murphy, Annie (January 20, 2011). "Tiger Mom: Amy Chua Parenting Memoir Raises American Fears". TIME. Retrieved January 28, 2011.
  11. ^ Hulbert, Ann (January 11, 2011). "Amy Chua's Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother: Her new book will make readers gasp. - By Ann Hulbert - Slate Magazine". Slate.com. Archived from the original on 19 January 2011. Retrieved January 28, 2011. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  12. ^ Mong, Adrienne. "Behind The Wall - Chinese or Western? Who wins the mommy war?". Behindthewall.msnbc.msn.com. Retrieved January 28, 2011.
  13. ^ Berwick, Isabel (January 17, 2011). "Review: Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother". Financial Times. The Financial Times, Ltd. Archived from the original on 20 January 2011. Retrieved January 28, 2011. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  14. ^ Brooks, David (January 17, 2011). "Amy Chua Is a Wimp". The New York Times.
  15. ^ Post Store (January 7, 2011). "Amy Chua's "Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother," on Chinese-American family culture". Washingtonpost.com. Retrieved January 28, 2011.
  16. ^ Amy Gutman (November 17, 2011). "Rousing the Tiger Mother Inside Me". The Huffington Post. {{cite news}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  17. ^ Jon Carroll (January 20, 2011). "The Tiger Mother speaks". San Francisco Chronicle. {{cite news}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  18. ^ a b Chittum, Ryan (January 13, 2011). "Audit Notes: Financial Capture, Homeless, Amy Chua Criticizes WSJ". Columbia Journalism Review.
  19. ^ Tiger Mother and Family, Live on Stage, WSJ Blogs, March 30th, 2011
  20. ^ 华裔“虎妈”纽约分享育儿心得 - Chinese descendent 'Tiger Mom' shared her child-raising insights in New-York, ThinkingChinese.com, April 22nd, 2011
  21. ^ Posted by IClaudio (January 22, 2011). "I Claudio: Amy Chua aka "Tiger Mom" Book Tour Review". Iclaudio2000.blogspot.com. Retrieved January 28, 2011.
  22. ^ "Tiger Mom Amy Chua Has Feelings Too". Jezebel.com. January 24, 2011. Retrieved January 28, 2011.
  23. ^ "Amy Chua:In der Höhle der Tigerin (In the tigeress' den)". Zeitmagazin. March 10, 2011.
  24. ^ The original English transcript of the interview with Amy Chua is not available. The quote was translated by Die Zeit to German and was then translated back to English by Wikipedia users. For details about various translation options see the discussion page. The quote reads in German as follows: "Niemals würde ich die Stofftiere meiner Kinder verbrennen – das war ein Stilmittel, eine Übertreibung. Ich habe viele Situationen zugespitzt, um meine Position klarzumachen. (...) Es war für mich Therapie im Moment einer großen Niederlage."
  25. ^ a b Chua-Rubenfeld, Sophia (January 17, 2011). "Why I love my strict Chinese mom". New York Post. Retrieved January 19, 2011.
  26. ^ http://kevinandkell.com/2011/kk0322.html
  27. ^ http://kevinandkell.com/2011/kk0321.html
  28. ^ http://kevinandkell.com/2011/kk0325.html