Talk:Constitutional right: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 15:40, 9 November 2012

Philosophy: Social and political Stub‑class

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Stub

This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Social and political philosophy

Inaccurate

This article is inaccurate. The 26th Amendment does not establish a "Right to Vote" that cannot be denied to persons. A better example of a constitutional right in the US would be the right to confront witnesses (See Confrontation Clause). I am going to change the article to reflect this. takethemud 04:54, 6 April 2006 (UTC)takethemud[reply]

Is this term US-specific?

This article is either horribly US-centric or should make it clear that it's talking exclusively about the United States. Moulder 07:01, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Marked disputed...71.196.246.113 (talk) 15:40, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong Wrong Wrong

Rights are not granted by the constitution. Rights are protected. If a thing is granted it is a privledge, not a right. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.167.19.170 (talk • contribs) 04:27, December 8, 2006 (UTC)

Added template due to lack of sources throughout

See above comments too. --NYScholar (talk) 19:19, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Scope of this article

Someone needs to decide whether this article is about "constitutional" or "inalienable" rights; i.e. whether it is about rights "merely" guaranteed by a constitution, or about rights asserted to be absolutely inherent to a person's status as a human being. Andrew Gwilliam (talk) 17:11, 15 September 2011 (UTC).[reply]

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 This article is either horribly US-centric or should make it clear that it's talking exclusively about the United States. [[User:Moulder|Moulder]] 07:01, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
+:Marked disputed...[[Special:Contributions/71.196.246.113|71.196.246.113]] ([[User talk:71.196.246.113|talk]]) 15:40, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
 == Wrong Wrong Wrong ==