Talk:Infrared spectroscopy correlation table: Difference between revisions
OxygenBlue (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
OxygenBlue (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
:Yours looks good and it's referenced which is a big plus. [[User:Matthias M.|Matthias M.]] ([[User talk:Matthias M.|talk]]) 17:03, 3 July 2009 (UTC) |
:Yours looks good and it's referenced which is a big plus. [[User:Matthias M.|Matthias M.]] ([[User talk:Matthias M.|talk]]) 17:03, 3 July 2009 (UTC) |
||
:the one on your user talk is vastly better - I wish I had seen it sooner. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/82.1.124.141|82.1.124.141]] ([[User talk:82.1.124.141|talk]]) 17:11, 20 October 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
:the one on your user talk is vastly better - I wish I had seen it sooner. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/82.1.124.141|82.1.124.141]] ([[User talk:82.1.124.141|talk]]) 17:11, 20 October 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
::I approve the new one a lot! [[User:OxygenBlue|OxygenBlue]] ([[User talk:OxygenBlue|talk]]) 10:43, 13 December 2012 (UTC) |
|||
== New version == |
== New version == |
||
Revision as of 10:43, 13 December 2012
 | Spectroscopy B‑class (inactive) | ||||||
| |||||||
Assessment
This article suffers from insufficient context, and the table is not referenced (though references for IR correlations are widely available). Also, the format of the chart has an appearance that I find annoying. Otherwise, it's fine. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 01:17, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
- Well this table is usually found in textbooks for organic chemists and not in encyclopedias. But the english version does not seem to be that strict about what Wikipedia is not. Matthias M. (talk) 17:03, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
- I don't understand your comment. If we put in melting points, why not IR specs? OxygenBlue (talk) 10:41, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
Correlations
The methyl peak at 1260 cm-1 (strong) is very specific for methyl bonded to silicium (CH3-Si). This should be specified in the table. --Langbein Rise (talk) 08:40, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
New version
I have a draft new version of the table ready at my user page. Feel free to browse and comment. I could use some suggestions for a sortkey for the group column. Probably it is also a good idea to create a second, concise version of the table that lists only the most important absorption ranges and can function as a quick reference. --Tweenk (talk) 01:06, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yours looks good and it's referenced which is a big plus. Matthias M. (talk) 17:03, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
- the one on your user talk is vastly better - I wish I had seen it sooner. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.1.124.141 (talk) 17:11, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
- I approve the new one a lot! OxygenBlue (talk) 10:43, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
New version
Since it is mentioned, that IR is valuable for inorganic compounds, an extension with complexes and salts would be appropriate. Does anyone know if this is common available? OxygenBlue (talk) 10:41, 13 December 2012 (UTC)