User talk:Akidd dublin

User:Akidd_dublin/arc_talk1 archived talk I: from the beginning upto 21st april 2006 User:Akidd_dublin/arc_talk2 archieved talk II: from 21st april to 10th may

MY TALK PAGE IS NOT THE PLACE FOR PERSONAL COMMUNICATION.
I DO NOT SPELL GRAMMATICALLY INCORRECT SENTENCES WITHIN ARTICLES.
IF ANYWAY THINK I DO, THEN MAKE IT THREE-LINE (IF POSSIBLE).

mass-to-charge ratio

Regarding your weak keep deleteion vote on mass-to-charge ratio You may have missed "novel proposal to replace the accepted m/z with the new m/q notation". It is not original scientific research but a proposal to replace a notation system and unit system.--Nick Y. 21:09, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

User:Akidd dublin/cleanup/they toldme

I highly recommend that you delete this. Many people (myself include) may interpret your page as an attack on various contributers of wikipedia. BigE1977 16:40, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Don't think so- i do not keep record who wrote it. Mad_Magazine.
People can save time to write these formula's. I do not include harrass terms, just funny things. I believe several user pages a very muchy attack on anyone who visits them. I dont want to get personal, and iam also not allowed to Akidd dublin•tl•ctr-l 16:57, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

I promize not to include links to users, if that's the danger. I have read (years ago) that programmers are sometimes treated and looked at like schoolkids. I do not have the time to go through it again and again. Akidd dublin•tl•ctr-l 18:48, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

One of the users, probably the primary one, is me. I'm not sure I interpret it as an "attack"; just more evidence of kookiness and inability to comprehend. For example, what is the (incorrectly formatted, but funcional) Mad (magazine) link about? Pure randomness. Fnarf999 21:32, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

i do not understand you, but probably it is a good idea to express yourself using a blog. then, it is possible to experience, that different people understand sometinhg fully ifferent. Akidd dublin•tl•ctr-l 12:45, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Concern over language difficulties

Hello. I have followed the recent thread about "weak language" on the Villiage pump, and want to give you some feedback. I am quite sure that you have good intentions, but unfortunately I (and others) am finding that your edits are causing great difficulty, quite likely because English is not your native language. There are many good editors here whose native language isn't english, and generally there's no problem, sometimes the phrasing might seem a little unusual, but the meaning is quite clear. However, I'm finding that with your edits, many of them do not make any sense at all, which is a serious problem.

I don't know what your native language is, or whether there is a wikipedia in that language, but if there is, could I suggest that you might find it more productive to edit where there is no language barrier. Without trying to be cruel, I do honestly think because of the language difficulty, your edits, no matter how well intentioned, are creating more problems than they are solving.

As I said, I'm not trying to be cruel, and I hope you take this the way it was intended. Regards, MartinRe 02:21, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

this only occured when i caused the edit of Red_hair. native or not, it was low quality. i am not going to argue further. no one complained about the wrong information within this article. Akidd dublin•tl•ctr-l 12:43, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Language barrier

Hi there. It seems some people are having difficulty communicating with you to explain their issues, so I would like to ask you what is your native language to see if we can all understand each other. Feel free to reply here or on my talk page. So, to put it simply, what language do you speak? Cowman109^Talk 23:55, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

see user page. Akidd dublin•tl•ctr-l 12:43, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism

I see that you just changed comments that Fnarf999 left you, changing 'gay' to 'ghey', 'homosexual' to 'people exclusively attrated to the same sex', and 'queer' to 'q-uea'. It is considered vandalism to change comments that someone else wrote and is completely unacceptable. Do not do it again. --Yamla 13:56, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

I do not want to discuss marriage here on wikipedia. I do not want to discuss it at all. Man and Woman shall marry. I will not change my opinion. It does not make sense to start a discussion with me about that topic. (If it continiues) I probably change to another account because this is embarassing (and abandon this account). I do not have to display the information on my userpage. Akidd dublin•tl•ctr-l 14:42, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Removing comments

You said: "i am considering to remove the complete talkin which fnarf999 is involved. this is getting nowhere. i do not have to keep unwanted personal writing."

Actually, you do have to keep fnarf999's comments. You cannot simply remove his comments. What you may do is archive this entire page (I can help you do this if you wish). This would mean moving all comments from this page to an archive page, clearing this page, and putting a link from this page back to the archive page. Do not simply remove fnarf999's comments. --Yamla 13:59, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

You said: "I do not want him to put his personal opinion (which does not really anymore talk about an article) to my userpage. Do i have to keep unrelated talk?"

I have already answered this question. You must keep his comments on your discussion page, or move all comments to an archive page. This comments to you are relevant to your significant problems with the English language. --Yamla 14:06, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Ok. I am doing what people ask me to do. "I do not want him to put his personal opinion to my userpage" - I do not see a grammar mistake within this sentence. I preceive this as harassment. I really ttry to spell correct sentences (within recent articles). Akidd dublin•tl•ctr-l 14:18, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

The grammatical error is that you should have used "on" instead of "to". Thus: "I do not want him to put his personal opinion on my userpage." However, Fnarf999 is not harassing you. He is pointing out the huge number of problems you have with the English language. You know this is true. You've been told this over and over again by multiple people here on Wikipedia. You have been told this on other forums dating back to at least 2004. Your English language skills are very bad. I know you are trying. I know you try hard to spell things correctly and to use proper grammar. But the fact remains, your English skills are very bad. --Yamla 14:22, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Wait. I try to emphasize where he puts it. Because he should not. I express he could put it somewhere else, if i use "to". If i write "on", it sounds i do not want him to put anything on my user talk page. The other forums generally spelled harassment, but we leave it at this point. My weak spelling does not whitewash their otherwise questionable content.

"on" - He is putting stuff to somewhere.

"to" - emphasizing the action of putting itself. He could talk to someone else, somewhere else. He should not have talked (or have put talk to ...) that way.

As far as i understand it, "on my userpage" is emphasizing "my", but not excluding he could do it somewhere else. Indeed he tranfers data FROM his mind TO somewhere else. This does not sound nice. FROM=SOURCE and TO=DESTIONATION.

• Also: "He is adding to my talk". He was at my site. He takes it on his reputation. It adds to his reputation. On his talk, he writes... There it goes. Akidd dublin•tl•ctr-l 14:38, 12 May 2006 (UTC)