Jump to content

User:Akidd dublin: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Akidd dublin (talk | contribs)
nice day today.
Akidd dublin (talk | contribs)
this has now been abandoned for the reason including geographic information into the user ID. it was considered for weeks.
Line 1: Line 1:
THIS USER ACCOUNT HAS BEEN ABANDONED.<br>
IT WAS CONSIDERED FOREHAND (GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION).<br>
WIKIPEDIA IS NOT A BBS/WEBLOG/PERSONAL WEBSITE.<br>
PEROSONALLY, I FIND MISTAKES 2 YEARS AGO COPMPLETELY UNINTERESTING.<br>
IN THE FUTURE, I WILL USE THE POLICES HOW TO MAKE EDITS.<br>
I WILL PUT BAD EDITS (NO COMMENT, RV TO WRONG DATA) TO INCIDENT/ARBITRATION/AFD.<br>
I HAVE ADDED SOME OF MY OWN PAGES TO A FEW ARTICLES. I BELIEVE THIS WAS GOOD FAITH (improving wikipedia). HOWEVER, I CAN NOT DO IT, TECHNICALLY.<br><br>
COMMENTS TO THE USER TALK MAY NOT BEEN READ.<br><br>

<table>
<table>
<tr bgcolor=#bbbbff><td>
<tr bgcolor=#bbbbff><td>
Line 10: Line 19:
<tr bgcolor=#bbbbff><td>
<tr bgcolor=#bbbbff><td>
contribution etc.</td></tr><tr><td><ul>
contribution etc.</td></tr><tr><td><ul>
<li>[[Wikisource:User:Nikemoto2511]]</li>
<li>[[Wikimedia:User:Nikemoto2511]]</li>
<li>[[User:Akidd_dublin/thisuser]]</li>
<li>[[User:Akidd_dublin/thisuser]]</li>
<li>[[User:Akidd_dublin/news]]</li>
<li>[[User:Akidd_dublin/news]]</li>
Line 21: Line 28:
</ul></td></tr>
</ul></td></tr>


==external links==
<tr bgcolor=#bbbbff><td>
[http://dictionary.reference.com dictionary.reference.com]
external links</td></tr><tr><td><ul>
<li>[http://dictionary.reference.com dictionary.reference.com (for word clearing)]</li>
<li>[http://news.yahoo.com yahoo news (a public news provider)]</li>
<li>[http://uk.geocities.com/nikemoto2511 nikemoto2511 homepage] information about superstition and ancient cultures.</li></ul>
</td></tr></table>

Revision as of 16:07, 12 May 2006

THIS USER ACCOUNT HAS BEEN ABANDONED.
IT WAS CONSIDERED FOREHAND (GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION).
WIKIPEDIA IS NOT A BBS/WEBLOG/PERSONAL WEBSITE.
PEROSONALLY, I FIND MISTAKES 2 YEARS AGO COPMPLETELY UNINTERESTING.
IN THE FUTURE, I WILL USE THE POLICES HOW TO MAKE EDITS.
I WILL PUT BAD EDITS (NO COMMENT, RV TO WRONG DATA) TO INCIDENT/ARBITRATION/AFD.
I HAVE ADDED SOME OF MY OWN PAGES TO A FEW ARTICLES. I BELIEVE THIS WAS GOOD FAITH (improving wikipedia). HOWEVER, I CAN NOT DO IT, TECHNICALLY.

COMMENTS TO THE USER TALK MAY NOT BEEN READ.

dictionary.reference.com

"may your reign continue for eternity, until pebbles grow into boulders covered in moss."

shortened japanese anthem

  • "negative communications are economical disruptive."
  • for contributions, it is required to follow chicago style.
    it is possible to regroup sentences in a way they do not contain capital letters.
contribution etc.